Cited by 23Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Effectiveness and Duration of Effect of Open-Label Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With ADHD

Adler, Lenard A., Lynch, Lauren R., Shaw, David M., Wallace, Samantha P., O’Donnell, Katherine E., Ciranni, Michael A., Briggie, Alexis M., Faraone, Stephen V.·2017·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objectives (a) Evaluate the efficacy and duration of effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in adult ADHD. (b) Assess the reliability and validity of the Adult ADHD Medication Smoothness of Effect Scale (AMSES) and Adult ADHD Medication Rebound Scale (AMRS). Method Adults ( N = 40) with ADHD were treated with LDX for up to 12 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The psychometric properties of the AMSES and AMRS are analyzed and compared with the ADHD-RS, ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) v1.1 Symptom Checklist, and Time-Sensitive ADHD Symptom Scale (TASS). Results ADHD-RS scores were significantly improved with LDX. The AMSES and AMRS had high internal consistency and were correlated with the ADHD-RS, ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist, and TASS. Conclusion LDX is effective in treating adult ADHD and has a smooth drug effect throughout the day with limited symptom rebound. The AMSES and AMRS are valid and reliable measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054713485421

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LDX has demonstrated efficacy at 14 hours post dose in adults.

    “Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate has demonstrated efficacy at 14 hours post dose in adults”
  • In the Wigal et al trial, PERMP total scores were greater at all post dose time points from 2 to 14 hours for adults on LDX compared with placebo.

    “The PERMP total scores were greater at all post dose time points from 2 to 14 hours for adults on LDX compared with placebo (P < .001).”
  • In the Wigal et al trial, ADHD-RS-IV total scores improved from baseline and CGI-I scores suggested that 76.5% of participants improved while taking LDX and 23.1% improved on placebo.

    “The ADHD-RS-IV total scores improved from baseline (P < .0001) and the CGI-I scores suggested that 76.5% of participants improved while taking LDX and 23.1% of participants improved on placebo (P < .0001).”
  • A 2-week placebo-controlled crossover trial by Wigal et al using a simulated Adult Workplace Environment demonstrated maintenance of therapeutic effects of LDX from 2 to 14 hours post dose in adults with ADHD, as noted by improvements in PERMP scores compared with placebo.

    “A 2-week placebo-controlled crossover trial by Wigal et al24 used a simulated Adult Workplace Environment (AWE) design and demonstrated the maintenance of therapeutic effects of LDX from 2 to 14 hours post dose in adults with ADHD, as noted by improvements in the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) scores, a 10-minute skill adjusted math test, compared with placebo.”
  • In the Wigal et al trial, PERMP-Attempted and PERMP-Correct scores at post dose time points were significantly improved for adults who received LDX compared with placebo at each time point.

    “the PERMP-Attempted (PERMP-A) and PERMP-Correct (PERMP-C) scores at post dose time points were significantly improved for adults who received LDX compared with placebo at each time point (P ≤ .0031).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adler, L. A., Lynch, L. R., Shaw, D. M., Wallace, S. P., O’Donnell, K. E., Ciranni, M. A., Briggie, A. M., & Faraone, S. V.
Affiliations
  • VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • HELP/PSI Inc, Bronx, NY, USA
  • Adult Community Mental Health Services, San Rafael, CA, USA
  • Adelphi University (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Adler, Lenard A.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2121092327
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, adult ADHD, duration of effect, psychometric validation, ADHD Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Medication Adherence, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review