Cited by 76Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Factorial Validity of the ADHD Adult Symptom Rating Scale in a French Community Sample: Results From the ChiP-ARD Study

Morin, Alexandre J. S., Tran, Antoine, Caci, Hervé·2016·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Recent publications reported that a bifactor model better represented the underlying structure of ADHD than classical models, at least in youth. The Adult ADHD Symptoms Rating Scale (ASRS) has been translated into many languages, but a single study compared its structure in adults across Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) classifications. Method: We investigated the factor structure, reliability, and measurement invariance of the ASRS among a community sample of 1,171 adults. Results: Results support a bifactor model, including one general ADHD factor and three specific Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Impulsivity factors corresponding to ICD-10, albeit the Impulsivity specific factor was weakly defined. Results also support the complete measurement invariance of this model across gender and age groups, and that men have higher scores than women on the ADHD G-factor but lower scores on all three S-factors. Conclusion: Results suggest that a total ASRS-ADHD score is meaningful, reliable, and valid in adults. (J. of Att. Dis. 2016; 20(6) 530-541)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054713488825

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA, and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries.

    “The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale of this sort based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA (Kessler et al. 2005), and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries (e.g., Lozano et al. 2016; Morin et al. 2016; Sjolander et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morin, A. J. S., Tran, A., & Caci, H.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
Corresponding author
Morin, Alexandre J. S.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2013-05-31
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
530-541
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W1997800756
Cited by
76
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
adult ADHD, bifactor model, factor structure, measurement invariance, inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, gender differences, DSM-IV, ICD-10, French adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, France, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review