Factorial Validity of the ADHD Adult Symptom Rating Scale in a French Community Sample: Results From the ChiP-ARD Study
Abstract
Objective: Recent publications reported that a bifactor model better represented the underlying structure of ADHD than classical models, at least in youth. The Adult ADHD Symptoms Rating Scale (ASRS) has been translated into many languages, but a single study compared its structure in adults across Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) classifications. Method: We investigated the factor structure, reliability, and measurement invariance of the ASRS among a community sample of 1,171 adults. Results: Results support a bifactor model, including one general ADHD factor and three specific Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Impulsivity factors corresponding to ICD-10, albeit the Impulsivity specific factor was weakly defined. Results also support the complete measurement invariance of this model across gender and age groups, and that men have higher scores than women on the ADHD G-factor but lower scores on all three S-factors. Conclusion: Results suggest that a total ASRS-ADHD score is meaningful, reliable, and valid in adults. (J. of Att. Dis. 2016; 20(6) 530-541)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA, and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries.
“The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale of this sort based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA (Kessler et al. 2005), and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries (e.g., Lozano et al. 2016; Morin et al. 2016; Sjolander et al. 2016).”
From The descriptive epidemiology of DSM-IV adult ADHD in the world health organization world mental health surveys (2017) · cites this paper as Morin et al. 2016
Cites
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217 · see citing works
On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19 · Cited by 3,538 · see citing works
KESSLER, R. C., ADLER, L., AMES, M., DEMLER, O., FARAONE, S., HIRIPI, E., HOWES, M. J., JIN, R., SECNIK, K., SPENCER, T., et al. (2005) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291704002892 · Cited by 3,452 · see citing works
FARAONE, S. V., BIEDERMAN, J., & MICK, E. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170500471x · Cited by 2,267 · see citing works
Biederman, J. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.816 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
Psychological heterogeneity in AD/HD—a dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00432-6 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
Shaw, M., Hodgkins, P., Caci, H., Young, S., Kahle, J., Woods, A. G., & Arnold, L. E. (2012) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-99 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Self-citationNigg, J. T., Goldsmith, H. H., & Sachek, J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3301_5 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Case Definition in Epidemiologic Studies of AD/HD
Katusic, S. K., Barbaresi, W. J., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., Leibson, C. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2005) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.12.004 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborators, O. B. O. T. W. W. M. H. S., Fayyad, J., Sampson, N. A., Hwang, I., Adamowski, T., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Al-Hamzawi, A., Andrade, L. H. S. G., Borges, G., de Girolamo, G., et al. (2017) · ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders · doi:10.1007/s12402-016-0208-3 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Montagni, I., Guichard, E., & Kurth, T. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009089 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Green, J. G., DeYoung, G., Wogan, M. E., Wolf, E. J., Lane, K. L., & Adler, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1751 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Alarachi, A., Merrifield, C., Rowa, K., & McCabe, R. E. (2024) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911231225190 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morin, A. J. S., Tran, A., & Caci, H.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Morin, Alexandre J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Attention Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-31
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 530-541
- ISSN
- 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1246
- OpenAlex
- W1997800756
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, bifactor model, factor structure, measurement invariance, inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, gender differences, DSM-IV, ICD-10, French adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, France, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review