Cited by 89Mental Health via WritingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Language of ADHD in Adults on Social Media

Guntuku, Sharath Chandra, Ramsay, J. Russell, Merchant, Raina M., Ungar, Lyle H.·2019·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: We computationally analyze the language of social media users diagnosed with ADHD to understand what they talk about, and how their language is correlated with users’ characteristics such as personality and temporal orientation. Method: We analyzed approximately 1.3 million tweets written by 1,399 Twitter users with self-reported diagnoses of ADHD, comparing their posts with those used by a control set matched by age, gender, and period of activity. Results: Users with ADHD are found to be less agreeable, more open, to post more often, and to use more negations, hedging, and swear words. Posts are suggestive of themes of emotional dysregulation, self-criticism, substance abuse, and exhaustion. A machine learning model can predict which of these Twitter users has ADHD with an out-of-sample AUC of .836. Conclusion: Based on this emerging technology, conjectures of future uses of social media by researchers and clinicians to better understand the naturalistic manifestations and sequelae of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054717738083

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with ADHD on Twitter have been found to post more often than those without ADHD and post about themes of emotional-dysregulation, self-criticism, substance use, and exhaustion.

    “People with ADHD on Twitter have been found to post more often than those without ADHD and post about themes of emotional-dysregulation, self-criticism, substance use, and exhaustion (Guntuku et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guntuku, S. C., Ramsay, J. R., Merchant, R. M., & Ungar, L. H.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Guntuku, Sharath Chandra
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
1475-1485
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2768073594
Cited by
89
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, social media language, Twitter, self-reported diagnosis, personality traits, time orientation, emotional dysregulation, self-criticism, substance abuse, exhaustion, swearing, computational text analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Emotions, Humans, Language, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review