Cited by 21Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMental Health Research TopicsDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Sluggish cognitive tempo in adults referred for an ADHD evaluation: a psychometric analysis of self- and collateral report

Open access
Lunsford-Avery, Jessica R., Kollins, Scott H., Mitchell, John T.·2021·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptoms uniquely contribute to psychiatric and functional outcomes in child samples; however, the psychometric properties of SCT measures among adult outpatients are unknown. Method: Adults ( n = 124) presenting for an ADHD evaluation provided self- and collateral report of SCT symptoms. Results: The SCT scale had good internal consistency and yielded three factors across raters: Slow/Daydreamy, Sleepy/Sluggish, and Low Initiation/Persistence. SCT scores exhibited convergent validity with ADHD symptoms across raters. Individuals with ADHD received higher SCT ratings than those without ADHD via collateral report, a pattern that was similar when comorbidity was considered. SCT was associated with poorer functioning after accounting for ADHD symptoms with some differential effects based on reporting source. Conclusion: Findings support the internal consistency and validity of a three-factor SCT scale among adult outpatients. Differential results between self- and collateral report demonstrate the importance of multiple reporters of SCT in clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054718787894

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In college students and adults, SCT is uniquely related to global sleep problems, shorter sleep duration, and increased daytime sleepiness.

    “In college students and adults, SCT is uniquely related to global sleep problems, shorter sleep duration, and increased daytime sleepiness.18,122–124”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results and Discussion identify a Sleepy/Sluggish SCT factor and examine its relationship with ADHD, but do not report associations with global sleep problems, sleep duration, or measured daytime sleepiness. Searches for those sleep outcomes found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increasing SCT severity is associated with multiple aspects of impairment (work, social relations, and community activities) as reported by self or collateral ratings, even after controlling for ADHD ratings.

    “Lunsford-Avery et al. found that increasing SCT severity was associated with multiple aspects of impairment (e.g., work, social relations, and community activities) as reported by self or collateral ratings, even after controlling for ADHD ratings (7).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB, & National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.). (1997). User’s guide for the Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders SCID-I: clinician version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Authors
Lunsford-Avery, J. R., Kollins, S. H., & Mitchell, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2018-07-19
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
322-331
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2884238524
Cited by
21
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23 DA 032577, K24 DA 023464)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH 108704)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, adult ADHD, self-report, collateral reports, psychometric properties, convergent validity, internal consistency, ADHD comorbidity, functional outcome, sleepiness
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review