The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication, Coherence, and Collective Action: The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Infrastructure
Abstract
Communications infrastructure is critical to managing the complex, dynamic operations that evolve in disaster environments. The impact of Hurricane Katrina destroyed the communications infrastructure within the New Orleans metropolitan region, leaving emergency response personnel and the public with little capacity to exchange information vital for coordinating response actions. The loss of communications proved especially damaging, given the size of the geographic region and the number of people affected. The authors used content analysis of news reports to identify the network of organizations that emerged in response to Hurricane Katrina, and network analysis to examine patterns of interaction among the organizations. The patterns reveal significant asymmetry in information among organizations at different levels of authority and responsibility in the disaster response system, a condition that contributed to the collapse of coordination in disaster operations. Conversely, well-designed communications and information infrastructure can contribute significantly to the resilience of communities exposed to recurring risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Cited by
Ready or Not? How Citizens and Public Officials Perceive Risk and Preparedness
Donahue, A. K., Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2014) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074013506517 · Cited by 141
Taioli, E., Tuminello, S., Lieberman-Cribbin, W., Bevilacqua, K., Schneider, S., Guzman, M., Kerath, S., & Schwartz, R. M. (2018) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2018-210626 · Cited by 41
Kim, E., Oh, Y., & Kennett, P. (2025) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746425000144 · Cited by 1
“…different government agencies, the private and voluntary sectors as well as citizens groups and a range of stakeholders is the next crucial element (Comfort and Haase, 2006) to support an inclusive people-centred approach, which is sensitive to and informed by different values and perspectives…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W.
- Venue
- Public Works Management & Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 328-343
- ISSN
- 1087-724X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7549
- OpenAlex
- W2029826216
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication, Coherence, and Collective Action: The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Infrastructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1087724x06289052
- The paper
- Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, Coherence, and Collective Action: The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x06289052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.