Cited by 130Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Why Religion’s Burdens Are Light: From Religiosity to Implicit Self-Regulation

Koole, Sander L., McCullough, Michael E., Kuhl, Julius, Roelofsma, Peter H. M. P.·2010·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

To maintain religious standards, individuals must frequently endure aversive or forsake pleasurable experiences. Yet religious individuals on average display higher levels of emotional well-being compared to nonreligious individuals. The present article seeks to resolve this paradox by suggesting that many forms of religion may facilitate a self-regulatory mode that is flexible, efficient, and largely unconscious. In this implicit mode of self-regulation, religious individuals may be able to strive for high standards and simultaneously maintain high emotional well-being. A review of the empirical literature confirmed that religious stimuli and practices foster implicit self-regulation, particularly among individuals who fully internalized their religion’s standards. The present work suggests that some seemingly irrational aspects of religion may have important psychological benefits by promoting implicit self-regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868309351109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 118 · Cited by 130

Authors
Koole, S. L., McCullough, M. E., Kuhl, J., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
Corresponding author
Koole, Sander L.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
95-107
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2398438771
Cited by
130
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
religion, religiosity, emotional well-being, religious internalization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Culture, Emotions, Existentialism, Fear, Humans, Internal-External Control, Object Attachment, Quality of Life, Religion and Psychology, Social Conformity, Social Identification, Unconscious, Psychology, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review