The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
5-a-Day Power Plus: Process Evaluation of a Multicomponent Elementary School Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Abstract
The 5-a-Day Power Plus program targeted multiethnic fourth- and fifth-grade students in 10 intervention and 10 control urban elementary schools in St. Paul, Minnesota, to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. The intervention included behavioral curricula in classrooms, parental involvement, school food service changes, and food industry support. Process evaluation was conducted by using surveys and classroom and lunchroom observations to assess the characteristics of teachers and food service staff, the degree the intervention was implemented as intended, and exteral factors that may have affected the program results. Results showed high levels of participation, dose, and fidelity for all of the intervention components, with the exception of parental involvement. The process evaluation findings help explain why the increase in fruit and vegetable consumption occurred mostly at school lunch and not at home. Future intervention research should focus on creating new and potent strategies for parental involvement and for increasing the appeal and availability of vegetables.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thirteen studies, including four RCTs were assessed as unclear risk of selection bias as methods of sequence generation and allocation were not reported [44, 46, 47, 50, 51, 54–56, 58, 64, 66, 67].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“For risk of bias due to baseline imbalances, the majority of studies (n = 11) were assessed as low risk as studies accounted for imbalances by making adjustments for baseline differences during analyses, stratifying by school characteristics or through random allocation of schools to experimental groups [37, 38, 41, 46, 47, 55, 56, 58, 60, 64, 67].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Potential risk of recruitment (to cluster) was assessed as low for seven studies as randomization occurred either postrecruitment or postbaseline data collection [47, 54–56, 58, 60, 64].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Three studies were high risk of bias due to incorrect analysis [42, 46, 58], while eight studies were assessed as low risk [27, 37, 38, 41, 54, 56, 64, 67] and the remaining studies (n = 4) at unclear risk [26, 47, 55, 60].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“For example, across the three studies assessing the availability of fruit and vegetables within schools, the median effect size was 1.15 and ranged from 0.64 to 1.23 [42, 55, 58].”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“U.S. studies targeting improvements in the availability of fruits and vegetables in à la carte lines typically significantly increased the mean number of fruit and vegetables options available by between 0.5 to 1.37 [58]”
From Improving implementation of school-based healthy eating and physical activity policies, practices, and programs: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Perry, C. L., Bishop, D., Taylor, G., Murray, D. M., Mays, R. W., Dudovitz, B., Smyth, M., & Story, M. T. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.4.603 · Cited by 342
Self-citationEvaluation of Health Education Programs: Current Assessment and Future Directions
Israel, B. A., Cummings, K. M., Dignan, M., Heaney, C. A., Perales, D. P., Simons‐Morton, B. G., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019819402200308 · Cited by 158
Design of Process Evaluation within the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH)
McGraw, S. A., Stone, E. J., Osganian, S. K., Elder, J. P., Perry, C. L., Johnson, C., Parcel, G. S., Webber, L. S., & Luepker, R. V. (1994) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10901981940210s103 · Cited by 129
Self-citationPerry, C. L., Sellers, D. E., Johnson, C., Pedersen, S., Bachman, K. J., Parcel, G. S., Stone, E. J., Luepker, R. V., Wu, M., Nader, P. R., et al. (1997) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019819702400607 · Cited by 123
Self-citationFamily-based cardiovascular risk reduction education among Mexican and Anglo-Americans
Nader, P. R., Sallis, J. F., ABRAMSON, I. S., Broyles, S. L., Patterson, T. L., Senn, K. L., Rupp, J. W., & Nelson, J. A. E. (1992) · Family & Community Health · doi:10.1097/00003727-199204000-00007 · Cited by 60
Health Behavior Interventions with Families
Baranowski, T., & Hearn, M. D. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0484-3_16 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0 · Cited by 5,304
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., Komro, K. A., Gibbs, L. F., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008958.pub2 · Cited by 768
Blanchette, L. M. G., & Brug, J. (2005) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2005.00648.x · Cited by 525
School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity
Lee, S. M. (2011) · Cited by 376
Review and Analysis of Evaluation Measures Used in Nutrition Education Intervention Research
Contento, I. R., Randell, J. S., & Basch, C. E. (2002) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60220-0 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Story, M., Mays, R. W., Bishop, D. B., Perry, C. L., Taylor, G., Smyth, M., & Gray, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Minnesota Department of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Story, Mary
- ORCID
- Perry, Cheryl L.
- Venue
- Health Education & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-200
- ISSN
- 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6127
- OpenAlex
- W2156110759
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA059805, CA59805)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- fruit and vegetable intake, school-based nutrition intervention, elementary school students, process evaluation, intervention fidelity, dosage, parental involvement, school meals, multicomponent intervention, urban schools, multi-ethnic students
- MeSH terms
- Child, Curriculum, Diet, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Inservice Training, Minnesota, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Schools, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Nutritional Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
