The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Feasibility of a Web-Based Surveillance System to Collect Health Risk Behavior Data from College Students
Abstract
This study examined the feasibility of collecting health risk behavior data from undergraduate students using a Web-based survey. Undergraduates were randomly selected and assigned randomly to a mail survey group and a Web survey group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for demographics, response rates, item completion, and item completion errors. Yet differences were found for response time and sensitive item completion. This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of collecting health risk behavior data from undergraduates using the Web. Undergraduates are just as likely to respond to a Web survey compared with a mail survey and more likely to answer socially threatening items using this method. Also, the Web format and protocol required less time to administer. Researchers and practitioners conducting health survey research with college students or other homogeneous populations who have access to e-mail and the Web should consider using a Web-based survey design as an alternative to a mail, self-administered survey. In such a population, a Web-based survey should not discourage participation, particularly if participants are interested in the questionnaire content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions
Schmidt, W. C. (1997) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204826 · Cited by 620
Cited by
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2008) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x08317085 · Cited by 1,159
Web-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology?
van Gelder, M. M. H. J., Bretveld, R. W., & Roeleveld, N. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq291 · Cited by 580
Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change
Shannon, T., Giles-Corti, B., Pikora, T., Bulsara, M., Shilton, T., & Bull, F. (2006) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.002 · Cited by 441
Kongsved, S. M., Basnov, M., Holm-Christensen, K., & Hjollund, N. H. (2007) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25 · Cited by 395
Advantages and limitations of web-based surveys: evidence from a child mental health survey
Heiervang, E., & Goodman, R. (2011) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0171-9 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Pealer, L. N., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D., & Dorman, S. M.
- Venue
- Health Education & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-559
- ISSN
- 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6127
- OpenAlex
- W2128823554
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Feasibility of a Web-Based Surveillance System to Collect Health Risk Behavior Data from College Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109019810102800503
- The paper
- Pealer, L. N., Weiler, R. M., Pigg, R. M., Miller, D., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). The Feasibility of a Web-Based Surveillance System to Collect Health Risk Behavior Data from College Students. Health Education & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810102800503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.