The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Health Education Programs: Current Assessment and Future Directions
Abstract
Recently there has been an increase in the different types of strategies used in health education interventions, including an emphasis on broadening programs focused on individual behavior change to include larger units of practice. There has also been an increasing critique of the traditional physical science paradigm for evaluating the multiple dimensions inherent in many interventions. Additionally, there is a growing recognition of the importance of involving multiple stakeholders in designing, implementing, and evaluating interventions. Each of these factors carries specific evaluation challenges. With the overall aim of strengthening the evaluation of health education programs, this article aims to (a) present conceptual and technical design issues and options, (b) describe different approaches to evaluation, (c) highlight evaluation approaches that have been effective, (d) critique the limitations of traditional evaluation approaches, (e) examine promising approaches and implications for future evaluations, and (f) provide recommendations for evaluation designs, data collection methods, roles, responsibilities, and principles for evaluating interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
An ecological perspective on health promotion programs
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818801500401 · Cited by 8,502
Research with Hispanic Populations
Marín, G., & Marín, B. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412985734 · Cited by 2,185
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000) · Handbook of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 · Cited by 1,653
Self-citationFarquhar, J. W. (1990) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450030083037 · Cited by 448
Cited by
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893
Self-citationPhotovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019819702400309 · Cited by 5,551
Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women's Health
WANG, C. C. (1999) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185 · Cited by 1,766
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (2001) · Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice · doi:10.1080/13576280110051055 · Cited by 936
Self-citationReconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential
Merzel, C., & D’Afflitti, J. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.557 · Cited by 713
Metadata
- Authors
- Israel, B. A., Cummings, K. M., Dignan, M. B., Heaney, C. A., Perales, D. P., Simons-Morton, B. G., & Zimmerman, M. A.
- Venue
- Health Education Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 364-389
- ISSN
- 0195-8402 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111660170
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Health Education Programs: Current Assessment and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109019819402200308
- The paper
- Israel, B. A., Cummings, K. M., Dignan, M. B., Heaney, C. A., Perales, D. P., Simons-Morton, B. G., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Evaluation of Health Education Programs: Current Assessment and Future Directions. Health Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402200308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.