Cited by 1,653Community Health and DevelopmentCommunity and Sustainable DevelopmentSocial Sciences and Policies

Empowerment Theory

Zimmerman, Marc A.·2000·Handbook of Community Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmerman, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zimmerman, Marc A.
Venue
Handbook of Community Psychology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2000
Pages
43-63
OpenAlex
W2786267815
Cited by
1,653
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 50
FWCI
76.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Community and Sustainable Development
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
Keywords
empowerment theory, empowerment, community empowerment, social change, community development, decision-making, organizational functioning, community life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review