The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Interaction Effects in Moderated Multiple Regression With Continuous Variables Power and Sample Size Considerations
Abstract
In view of the long-recognized difficulties in detecting interactions among continuous variables in moderated multiple regression analysis, this article aims to address the problem by providing feasible solutions to power calculation and sample size determination for significance test of moderating effects. The proposed approach incorporates the essential factors of strength of moderator effect, magnitude of error variation, and distributional property of predictor and moderator variables into a unified framework. Accordingly, careful consideration across different plausible and practical configurations of the prescribed factors is an important aspect of power and sample size computations in planning moderated multiple regression research. The performance of the suggested procedure and an alternative simplified method is illustrated with detailed numerical studies. The simulation results demonstrate that an acceptable degree of accuracy can be obtained using the recommended method in assessing moderated relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94 · Cited by 1,216
Cited by
Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428116641191 · Cited by 445
Gignac, G. E., & Zajenkowski, M. (2020) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101449 · Cited by 183
Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications
Poropat, A. E. (2014) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.013 · Cited by 150
Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2010) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01291.x · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Shieh, G.
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-07-29
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 510-528
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2069825029
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Interaction Effects in Moderated Multiple Regression With Continuous Variables Power and Sample Size Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094428108320370
- The paper
- Shieh, G. (2009). Detecting Interaction Effects in Moderated Multiple Regression With Continuous Variables Power and Sample Size Considerations. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108320370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.