Cited by 239Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Explained variance measures for multilevel models

Open access
LaHuis, David M., Hartman, Michael J., Hakoyama, Shotaro, Clark, Patrick C.·2014·Organizational Research Methods

Abstract

One challenge in using multilevel models is determining how to report the amount of explained variance. In multilevel models, explained variance can be reported for each level or for the total model. Existing measures have been based primarily on the reduction of variance components across models. However, these measures have not been reported consistently because they have some undesirable properties. The present study is one of the first to evaluate the accuracy of these measures using Monte Carlo simulations. In addition, a measure based on the full partitioning of variance in multilevel models was examined. With the exception of the Level 2 explained variance measure, all other measures performed well across our simulated conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428114541701

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaHuis, D. M., Hartman, M. J., Hakoyama, S., & Clark, P. C.
Affiliations
Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
LaHuis, David M.
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
433-451
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
OpenAlex
W2155655748
Cited by
239
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
explained variance, multilevel models, variance partitioning, variance components, measurement accuracy, Monte Carlo simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review