What Is the True Value of a Lost Customer?
Abstract
Customer profitability models have evolved into an important strategic tool for marketers in recent years. Traditional customer profitability models implicitly assume that customers can be valued in isolation from one another and that social interactions can be ignored. The authors show that these conventional models may be inappropriate for markets involving new products or services because they fail to account for the social effects (e.g., word of mouth and imitation) that can influence future customer acquisitions. They show how the impact of a lost customer on the profitability of the firm depends on (a) whether the customer defects to a competing firm or disadopts the technology altogether and (b) when the customer disadopts the technology—distinctions often overlooked in conventional models. The results demonstrate how the value of a lost customer changes throughout the product life cycle, showing that the loss of an early adopter costs the firm much more than the loss of a later adopter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customers vary in their importance to service firms.
“Specifically, as suggested by that literature, customers vary in their importance to service firms, and their individual value should therefore be assessed (e.g., Bell et al. 2002;Hogan, Lemon, and Libai 2003;Venkatesan and Kumar 2004).”
From Recovery Voice and Satisfaction After Service Failure: An Experimental Investigation of Mediating and Moderating Factors (2007) · cites this paper as Hogan, Lemon, and Libai 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N., & Libai, B.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- ORCID
- Libai, Barak
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 196-208
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2124903281
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 41.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- customer profitability, customer churn, word of mouth, imitation, social consequences, new product markets, product life cycle, early adopters, customer acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review