GenAI-Infused Service Delivery: Micro-Level Augmentation Patterns at the Service Frontline
Open accessAbstract
The infusion of generative AI (GenAI) is already disrupting established services. This technology’s generative and agentic nature challenges the design and management of service routines, which have been previously handled primarily by frontline service employees. Guided by organizational routines theory, our longitudinal study (2020–2024) examines how the infusion of GenAI changes routines in customer support services. We gathered interview data from 41 employees, managers, and AI experts in two phases, pre- and post-GenAI . Based on the analysis of the qualitative data, we revealed seven recurring micro-level augmentation patterns, illustrating how GenAI-infused service routines function. The results show that GenAI is primarily embedded in the backstage of knowledge-intensive services, from which it then permeates the frontstage. We contribute to the literature on hybrid human–AI service delivery by identifying augmentation patterns and conceptualizing service permeation via two mechanisms: (1) simultaneous service permeation , which unfolds as employees leverage GenAI in real-time and integrate GenAI’s responses, recommendations, and adaptations into the frontstage; (2) sequential service permeation , which emerges as employees perform new routines of documentation and AI feeding to facilitate GenAI’s adaptability in frontstage and backstage operations. The MAPs and service permeation mechanisms guide practitioners in integrating GenAI into service routines and managing novel employee-GenAI collaborations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in service
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670517752459 · Cited by 3,978 · see citing works
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjae044 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Agentic AI: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals–a comprehensive survey
Acharya, D. B., Kuppan, K., & Divya, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532853 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0186 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationGaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Reinhard, P., Li, M. M., Peters, C., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE)
- University of St.Gallen (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Reinhard, Philipp
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-03-02
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W7133333066
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (02K18D060)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Robotic Process Automation Applications
- Keywords
- generative AI, customer support services, frontline service employees, knowledge-intensive services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review