The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Service Delivery to What Might Have Been: Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment
Abstract
The effects of the specific emotions disappointment and regret on customers’ behavioral responses to failed service encounters were examined. Study 1, using a vignette methodology, showed that regret was more associated with switching behavior than was disappointment and that disappointment was more associated with word of mouth and complaining than was regret. These results were largely replicated in Study 2, in which each customer was asked to report an autobiographical episode in which he or she experienced dissatisfaction with a service. Characteristics of this experience, as well as regret, disappointment, satisfaction, and behavioral responses, were assessed. As hypothesized, regret had a direct effect on customers’ switching, over and above the effect of dissatisfaction. Moreover, disappointment had a direct effect on word of mouth, over and above the effect of dissatisfaction. Finally, neither regret nor disappointment had a direct effect on the actual complaining in Study 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Cited by
The push, pull and mooring effects in virtual migration for social networking sites
Chang, I., Liu, C., & Chen, K. (2014) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12030 · Cited by 271
Ozuem, W., Ranfagni, S., Willis, M., Rovai, S., & Howell, K. (2021) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21527 · Cited by 140
When Sharing Consumption Emotions With Strangers Is More Satisfying Than Sharing Them With Friends
López-López, I., Ruiz-de-Maya, S., & Warlop, L. (2014) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514538835 · Cited by 72
The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking
Roese, N. J., & Morrison, M. (2009) · GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences · doi:10.12759/hsr.34.2009.2.16-26 · Cited by 69
(2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203726594 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-97
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2030220944
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.