Cited by 3Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

Misogynistic and Homophobic “Banter” in UK Digitised “Lad Cultures”: Using Research and Homosocial Affect Theory in an Educational Resource to Tackle Harmful Masculine Norms

Open access
Haslop, Craig, O’Rourke, Fiona·2026·Men and Masculinities

Abstract

There is a growing scholarship which focuses on the effectiveness of interventions that aim to develop men's critical awareness of harmful norms of masculinity, including those associated with misogyny and homophobia. This paper makes a unique contribution to this literature by showing how qualitative research with young (18–25 years old) cisgender heterosexual men ( n = 42) about their digital homosocial practices, alongside relevant theory, underpinned the development of an educational toolkit called #Men4Change. In the paper, we highlight how banter is a potent form of homosocial currency in British young cisgender heterosexual men’s friendship groups as part of “lad culture”, which operates in specific ways in digital spaces. For example, young cisgender heterosexual men (18–25-year-olds) are often reluctant to challenge misogynistic “banter” in the private spaces of their online homosocial chat groups (e.g., those facilitated by WhatsApp ) because they want to fit into their laddish friendship groups and benefit from the affective intensities of the groups. We show how hegemonic masculinity theory, alongside scholarship about men’s homosociality and its affective aspects, can be useful in developing gender transformative approaches which help young men challenge normalised misogyny and homophobia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1097184x251333778

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misogynistic bullying is increasingly common in schools, as male students internalize and act out the hostile masculinist discourses they encounter online.

    “Mishna et al. (2020) find that misogynistic bullying is increasingly common in schools, as male students internalize and act out the hostile masculinist discourses they encounter online (see also Haslop and O'Rourke 2025).”
  • This same policing extends into digital spaces, where young people use social media and messaging apps to enforce gender norms through online rumour spreading, creating deepfake images and non-consensual sharing of intimate images.

    “As we have shown, this same policing extends into digital spaces, where young people use social media and messaging apps to enforce gender norms through online rumour spreading, creating deepfake images and non-consensual sharing of intimate images (see also Haslop and O'Rourke 2025).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haslop, C., & O’Rourke, F.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Haslop, Craig
Venue
Men and Masculinities
Published
2025-05-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
147-168
ISSN
  • 1097-184X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6828
OpenAlex
W4410039148
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Men and Masculinities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P010628/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
lad culture, misogyny, homophobia, hegemonic masculinity, young men, WhatsApp, educational toolkit, gender-transformative interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review