Misogynistic and Homophobic “Banter” in UK Digitised “Lad Cultures”: Using Research and Homosocial Affect Theory in an Educational Resource to Tackle Harmful Masculine Norms
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing scholarship which focuses on the effectiveness of interventions that aim to develop men's critical awareness of harmful norms of masculinity, including those associated with misogyny and homophobia. This paper makes a unique contribution to this literature by showing how qualitative research with young (18–25 years old) cisgender heterosexual men ( n = 42) about their digital homosocial practices, alongside relevant theory, underpinned the development of an educational toolkit called #Men4Change. In the paper, we highlight how banter is a potent form of homosocial currency in British young cisgender heterosexual men’s friendship groups as part of “lad culture”, which operates in specific ways in digital spaces. For example, young cisgender heterosexual men (18–25-year-olds) are often reluctant to challenge misogynistic “banter” in the private spaces of their online homosocial chat groups (e.g., those facilitated by WhatsApp ) because they want to fit into their laddish friendship groups and benefit from the affective intensities of the groups. We show how hegemonic masculinity theory, alongside scholarship about men’s homosociality and its affective aspects, can be useful in developing gender transformative approaches which help young men challenge normalised misogyny and homophobia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misogynistic bullying is increasingly common in schools, as male students internalize and act out the hostile masculinist discourses they encounter online.
“Mishna et al. (2020) find that misogynistic bullying is increasingly common in schools, as male students internalize and act out the hostile masculinist discourses they encounter online (see also Haslop and O'Rourke 2025).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Haslop and O'Rourke 2025
This same policing extends into digital spaces, where young people use social media and messaging apps to enforce gender norms through online rumour spreading, creating deepfake images and non-consensual sharing of intimate images.
“As we have shown, this same policing extends into digital spaces, where young people use social media and messaging apps to enforce gender norms through online rumour spreading, creating deepfake images and non-consensual sharing of intimate images (see also Haslop and O'Rourke 2025).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Haslop and O'Rourke 2025
Cites
Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61683-4 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Shouse, E. (2005) · M/C Journal · doi:10.5204/mcj.2443 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Abramsky, T., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Nakuti, J., Kyegombe, N., Starmann, E., Cundill, B., Francisco, L., Kaye, D., Musuya, T., et al. (2014) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Ringrose, J., Regehr, K., & Whitehead, S. (2022) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2021.1947206 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
No Homo: Gendered Dimensions of Homophobic Epithets Online
Pascoe, C. J., & Diefendorf, S. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0926-4 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Mishna et al. (2020) find that misogynistic bullying is increasingly common in schools, as male students internalize and act out the hostile masculinist discourses they encounter online (see also Haslop and O’Rourke 2025).”
- Authors
- Haslop, C., & O’Rourke, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Haslop, Craig
- Venue
- Men and Masculinities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-168
- ISSN
- 1097-184X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6828
- OpenAlex
- W4410039148
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Men and Masculinities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P010628/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- lad culture, misogyny, homophobia, hegemonic masculinity, young men, WhatsApp, educational toolkit, gender-transformative interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review