Cited by 92Gender, Feminism, and MediaGender, Sexuality, and EducationSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

‘Wanna trade?’: Cisheteronormative homosocial masculinity and the normalization of abuse in youth digital sexual image exchange

Open access
Ringrose, Jessica, Regehr, Katilyn, Whitehead, Sophie·2022·Journal of Gender Studies

Abstract

This paper draws upon a qualitative study with 144 young people in seven different research schools in England, exploring how cis-heteronormative homosocial masculinity practices shape digital sexual image exchange. We examine three types of practices: 1) boys asking girls for nudes (pressurized sexting, which we position as online sexual harassment); 2) transactional nude solicitation (boys sending dick pics and asking girls for nudes, which we position as image based sexual harassment and cyberflashing); 3) non-consensual sharing of girls and boys nude images (which we position as image based sexual abuse, showing the differential impacts with lasting sexual stigma worse for girls). Our findings confirm earlier research that demonstrated homosocial masculinity currency is gained via the non-consensual sharing of images of girls’ bodies. We also investigate the more recent rise of male nudes (dick pics) and how a homosocial culture of humour and lad banter tends to lessen the sexual stigmatization of leaked dick pics. We argue providing boys with time and space to reflect on homosocial masculinity performances is crucial for disrupting these practices and our conclusions outline new UK school guidance for tackling online sexual harassment, cyberflashing and image-based sexual abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09589236.2021.1947206

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IBSA is often a normalized practice of homosocial masculine bonding-"lad culture"-where leaked images of some men may be seen as humorous, and which may have less stigmatization and affect because of sexual double standards for women and non-binary people compared to men.

    “Finally, IBSA is often a normalized practice of homosocial masculine bonding—as part of what is commonly referred to as “lad culture”—where leaked images of (some) men may be seen as humorous, and which may have less stigmatization and affect precisely because of the sexual double standards that continue to exist for women and non-binary people compared to men (Ringrose et al., 2022).”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Ringrose et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringrose, J., Regehr, K., & Whitehead, S.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Kent
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ringrose, Jessica
Venue
Journal of Gender Studies
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
243-261
ISSN
  • 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3869
OpenAlex
W3188341412
Cited by
92
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
16.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kent Impact Funds
  • University of Kent Impact Funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
cisheteronormativity, sexting, cyberflashing, image-based sexual abuse, sexual stigma, online sexual harassment, school counseling, youth, gender norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review