Evaluations of After-School Programs: A Meta-Evaluation of Methodologies and Narrative Synthesis of Findings
Abstract
Funding for after-school programs has increased dramatically, and there has been a corresponding increase in the need for sound evaluations to document the quality and impact of the programs. A comprehensive search for after-school evaluations was completed in order to conduct a meta-evaluation of evaluation methodologies used and to synthesize the findings of the evaluations. Results of the meta-evaluation indicate that the after-school evaluation reports located for the study demonstrated moderate compliance with The Program Evaluation Standards established by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation but limited use of research designs that support causal conclusions and insufficient information to allow for meta-analysis of program effects. However, some tentative conclusions can be reached about the effectiveness of after-school programs. Overall, it appears that after-school programs may have positive impacts on participants, but more rigorous research designs are necessary to provide data that clearly document program effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scott-Little et al. (2002) concluded that after-school programs appear to have positive impacts, but included studies lacked designs for causal inference.
“Scott-Little and colleagues (Scott-Little et al. 2002) concluded in their review of 23 studies that after-school programs appear to have positive impacts on participants, but the included studies lacked the type of research designs and information to allow for making causal inferences.”
From Effects of after-school programs with at-risk youth on attendance and externalizing behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Scott-Little et al. 2002
Cites
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085 · see citing works
(2002) · Cited by 13,211 · see citing works
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252 · see citing works
Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews
Cooper, H. (1998) · Cited by 1,285 · see citing works
Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods
Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1998) · Cited by 1,180 · see citing works
The Handbook of Research Synthesis
Hanka, R. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6952.488a · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Promoting Healthy Adolescents: Synthesis of Youth Development Program Evaluations
Roth, J. L., Jeanne Brooks-gunn, B., Murray, L. F., & Foster, W. (1998) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0804_2 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Common purpose: strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3612 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2002) · Prevention & Treatment · doi:10.1037//1522-3736.5.1.515a · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Randomized Experiments for Planning and Evaluation
Boruch, R. F. (1997) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985574 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
The Program Evaluation Standards
(2005) · Encyclopedia of Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781412950558.n446 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Low-Income Children's After-School Care: Are There Beneficial Effects of After-School Programs?
Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131395 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Experiences in After-School Programs and Children's Adjustment in First-Grade Classrooms
Pierce, K. M., Hamm, J. V., & Vandell, D. L. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00054 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Social Experiments: Some Developments Over the Past Fifteen Years
Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.002553 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/109821400102200204 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Protecting Teens: Beyond Race, Income and Family Structure.
Blum, R. W., Beuhring, T., & Rinehart, P. M. (2000) · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer?
Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1290 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Heinsman, D. T., & Shadish, W. R. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.154 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
School Desegregation and Black Achievement
Wortman, P. M., & Bryant, F. B. (1985) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124185013003002 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
The promise of after-school programs for low-income children
Halpern, R. (2000) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0885-2006(00)00056-9 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Prevention and Intervention Programming: Lessons from an After-School Program
Beck, E. L. (1999) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1023/a:1023200500215 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Phillips, R. S. C. (1999) · Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1781 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A Two-Year Evaluation of the Wood Rock Youth Development Project
LoSciuto, L. A., Hilbert, S. M., Fox, M., Porcellini, L. E., & Lanphear, A. (1999) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431699019004004 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A Layering of Family and Friends
Hidalgo, N. M. (1997) · Education and Urban Society · doi:10.1177/0013124597030001002 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Extended Service Schools: Putting Programming in Place.
Walker, K., Grossman, J. B., & Raley, R. (2000) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Evaluation of the New York City Beacons. Phase I Findings.
Warren, C., Brown, P. R., & Freudenberg, N. (1999) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Enhancing the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Evaluation: A Concept PaperPreprint
Moore, M. T., Dynarski, M., Mullens, J., et al. (2000) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Out-of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076002275 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Kremer, K. P., Maynard, B. R., Polanin, J. R., Vaughn, M. G., & Sarteschi, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0226-4 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Fidelity in After-School Program Intervention Research: A Systematic Review
Maynard, B. R., Peters, K. E., Vaughn, M. G., & Sarteschi, C. M. (2013) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731513491150 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scott-Little, C., Hamann, M. S., & Jurs, S. G.
- Affiliations
- The Regional Educational Laboratory at SERVE, P.O. Box 5367, Greensboro, NC 27435, USA,
- Corresponding author
- Scott-Little, Catherine
- Venue
- American Journal of Evaluation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-419
- ISSN
- 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0878
- OpenAlex
- W2129668972
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Vocational Training
- Keywords
- after-school programs, program evaluation, evaluation methodology, meta-evaluation, program evaluation standards, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, research design, causal inference, program effectiveness, youth development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review