The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Have We Learned Anything New About the Use of Evaluation?
Abstract
“Use of evaluation” used to mean the use of results for making program decisions. Now we are aware of its larger dimensions. Many aspects of evaluation can be used-ideas and insights, signals that are sent by the very fact of evaluating, the processes of learning through cooperation with evaluation, the choice of outcome indicators that herald success, even the study design. “Use” encompasses a broad array of effects by multiple classes of users. The paper highlights the importance of considering further potential collective users-the program organization, client groups, and civil society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results of the data analysis have undermined certain myths, which Weiss (1998) refers to as the enlightenment function.”
From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Weiss (1998)
Citations
Cites
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J. L., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,238
(1987) · Cited by 6,910
Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach
Roberts, A. S., Sabatier, P., & Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (1994) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.2307/3551961 · Cited by 3,599
Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice.
Greenwood, D. J., Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2525281 · Cited by 3,455
Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol
Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392467 · Cited by 1,724
Utilization-focused evaluation : the new century text
Patton, M. Q. (1997) · Cited by 1,469
Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion
Weiss, C. H. (1980) · Knowledge · doi:10.1177/107554708000100303 · Cited by 669
Self-citationSystematic Thinking for Social Action
Tullock, G., & Rivlin, A. M. (1972) · Journal of money credit and banking · doi:10.2307/1991056 · Cited by 367
Professional evaluation: social impact and political consequences
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-1583 · Cited by 289
The New American Political System
Williams, P. M. (1979) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2616385 · Cited by 275
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Alkin, M. C., 1990, Debates on evaluation
- Breslau, D., Theory and Society
- Huberman, M., 1989, Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 2, 6
- Senge, P. M., The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organizations
- Shadish, W. R., 1997, EVALTALK message
- Shulha, L. M., American Evaluation Association meeting
- Weiss, C. H., 1967, House of Representatives committee on government operations, The use of social research in federal domestic programs, 426
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–383 of 383
Jabot, F., Romagon, J., & Dardier, G. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21091240 · Cited by 1
New Roles for Evaluation at the Detroit Institute of Arts
Sikora, M., Fischer, D., Serrell, B., Perry, D., & Morris, K. (2009) · Curator The Museum Journal · doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.tb00332.x · Cited by 1
The Evaluation of the Implementation of Sustainability Norms
Pülzl, H., & Wydra, D. (2011) · International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development · doi:10.4018/jsesd.2011010103 · Cited by 1
Il dilemma della politica: incrementalismo, possibilismo e teoria della complessità
Marra, M. (2016) · RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione · doi:10.3280/riv2015-062010 · Cited by 1
Governance Structures and the “(De)Politicization” of Performance Measures
Minassians, H. P., & Roy, R. K. (2017) · System dynamics for performance management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57018-1_6 · Cited by 1
John, P. C. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2475337 · Cited by 1
Caracelli, V. J., & Preskill, H. S. (2000) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1187 · Cited by 1
Patton, M. Q. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Social Measurement · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00188-2 · Cited by 1
Muggeo, V. M. R., & Aiello, F. (2010) · Contributions to statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2375-2_9
Scott, T., & Darlington, Y. (2011) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x1101100105
López, M. Á. D., Izquierdo, B., & Zaldúa, E. M. (2010) · Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas · doi:10.24965/gapp.v0i4.441
A New Analytical Approach on Continuous Improvement Evaluation-A National Presentation Case
Chen, C. L. (2008) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v3i4.250
Vecchi, G. (2013) · RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione · doi:10.3280/riv2012-053007
‘Who you know and what you have to Say’: An Alternative Look at Knowledge Mobilisation Theory
Brown, C. (2014) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.2501/ijmr-2014-034
Silva, D. A. V. S., & Fonseca, M. V. D. A. (2015) · Revista de Administração Pública · doi:10.1590/0034-7612132083
The Role of Health Economics in Decision‐Making
Phillips, C. J. (2005) · doi:10.1002/9780470755228.ch6
A developing context: Evaluation and FedNor's evolving institutional context
Sharaput, M. (2016) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/capa.12195
Jelinčić, D. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52721-5_2
Trevisan, M. S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58179-8_12
Monteiro, D. A. A., & Ribeiro, E. M. (2017) · RACE - Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Economia · doi:10.18593/race.v0i0.13821
Santos, J. B. D. (2018) · Revista Temas em Educação · doi:10.22478/ufpb.2359-7003.2017v26n1.25931
Welke factoren bevorderen of belemmeren het gebruik van beleidsevaluaties?
Bouterse, M., & Pattyn, V. (2018) · Beleidsonderzoek Online · doi:10.5553/bo/221335502018000003001
Improving "Data-Based Policy Evaluation" in South Korea
조현구 (2018) · Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.17939/hushss.2018..61.006
Theories of Change and Programme Logic
Cloete, F., & Auriacombe, C. J. (2014) · African Sun Media eBooks · doi:10.18820/9781920689513/03
Monitoring the crime prevention policy in Minas Gerais
Maia, T. P., & de Assis, M. A. (2020) · Revista de Administração Pública · doi:10.1590/0034-761220190058x
Park, S.-Y. (2020) · The Korean Association of General Education · doi:10.46392/kjge.2020.14.3.97
EDUCAÇÃO DE JOVENS E ADULTOS A DISTÂNCIA: AVALIAÇÃO DO PROGRAMA CURRICULAR DO SESI DA BAHIA
Freitas, G. M. D. O., Ferreira, M. D. C. A., da Silva, F. D. P. S., & Matta, A. E. R. (2020) · Práxis Educacional · doi:10.22481/praxisedu.v16i42.7353
Ingressei no Ensino Superior, e agora?
Lima, W. A. S., Alves, L. M. S., & Canela, D. C. D. S. (2022) · Revista Agenda Política · doi:10.31990/agenda.2021.2.10
Дигиталне технологије и правни оквир културне политике у Србији
Стојановић, А. (2021) · Institut za pozorište, film, radio i televiziju; Fakultet dramskih umetnosti; CLIO eBooks · doi:10.18485/fdu_dhkum.2021.ch3
Evaluation in the United States of America
Donaldson, S. I., Donaldson, S. I., & Renger, J. A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81139-6_12
How Researchers Can Better Inform Education Policy
(2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78743-640-420171010
The Evaluation of the Implementation of Sustainability Norms
Pülzl, H., & Wydra, D. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0882-5.ch502
The Evaluation of the Implementation of Sustainability Norms
Pülzl, H., & Wydra, D. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3613-2.ch003
Pourquoi la simplification administrative est-elle si compliquée?
OCDE (2011) · Eliminer la paperasserie · doi:10.1787/9789264089778-fr
A Critical Systems View of Power-Ethics Interactions in Information Systems Evaluation
Córdoba‐Pachón, J. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-022-6.ch046
OECD (2009) · Eliminer la paperasserie · doi:10.1787/19976712
(2012) · Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pum.6033
The Evaluation of the Implementation of Sustainability Norms
Pülzl, H., & Wydra, D. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0882-5.ch5.2
Evaluación y toma de decisiones diálogos entre políticos y académicos para fortalecer la democracia
Neirotti, N., & Jaramillo, A. (2020) · Ediciones de la UNLa eBooks · doi:10.18294/rdi.2022.177353
EL USO DE LA EVIDENCIA EVALUATIVA EN EL CONGRESO MEXICANO
Rodríguez, B., & de México, U. N. A. (2022) · Polis. Investigación y Análisis Sociopolítico y Psicosocial · doi:10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/lopez
Evaluation politics in international organizations
Jankauskas, V., & Eckhard, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192855206.003.0003
Political evaluation use in international organizations
Jankauskas, V., & Eckhard, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192855206.003.0007
Jankauskas, V., & Eckhard, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192855206.003.0008
Jankauskas, V., & Eckhard, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192855206.003.0001
WAKOLI, S. A., KADIMA, J. M., & MIROGA, D. J. (2022) · Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management · doi:10.61426/sjbcm.v9i2.2273
Høydal, Ø. S. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2264862
Turner, H., & Durodoye, R. (2023) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09695-1
Pinto, D. M., & Bin, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4862755
(2024) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781035321483.00018
Programme evaluation in action: theory to practice from an Asian educational context
Lee, S. M. M., & Liu, W. C. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2355306
Institutionalized Policy Evaluation within the Democratic System: Why? When? How?
Fumagalli, C. (2025) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1111/japp.12796
Secinaro, S. F., Degregori, G., Brescia, V., & Biancone, P. (2025) · Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review · doi:10.22495/cgobrv9i1p4
da Silva, E. M. O., & Paixão, R. B. (2025) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/10982140251358200
Bhorkar, S., Glew, D., & Fletcher, M. (2025) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2025.2540848
How Do Institutions Evidence Effectiveness via Evaluation?
Austen, L., Crockford, J., & McCaig, C. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83549-954-220251007
Linking Evaluation and Education
Schwandt, T. A. (2000) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-862-320251011
Sheldon, S. B. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-670-420251018
Step 6 Post-Harvest Support for Use
(2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64113-394-4-20251008
Additional file 1 of Centering Indigenous knowledge in suicide prevention: a critical scoping review
Sjoblom, E., Ghidei, W., Leslie, M., James, A., Bartel, R., Campbell, S., & Montesanti, S. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26555642
Additional file 3 of Centering Indigenous knowledge in suicide prevention: a critical scoping review
Sjoblom, E., Ghidei, W., Leslie, M., James, A., Bartel, R., Campbell, S., & Montesanti, S. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26555648
Additional file 2 of Centering Indigenous knowledge in suicide prevention: a critical scoping review
Sjoblom, E., Ghidei, W., Leslie, M., James, A., Bartel, R., Campbell, S., & Montesanti, S. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26555645
FIGURE 4 in Two new species of Platymantis (Anura: Ranidae) from New Britain
Kraus, F., & Allison, A. (2007) · INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.176944
Ahmadin, A., Fatmawati, F., Winarko, E., & Windarto, W. (2025) · Statistics Optimization & Information Computing · doi:10.19139/soic-2310-5070-2436
Explore, explain, evaluate and predict: Purposeful research
Park, J. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26629-4.00260-4
Veenstra, N., Gustafson, P. E., Lambert, M. V., Kremer, L. J., O'Loughlin, H., Bartholomew, K., Carswell, P., Ratima, M. M., Fusheini, A., Priest, P. C., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2026.1733685
Moran, J. J., Craig, M., & Collins, D. (2026) · Sports Coaching Review · doi:10.1080/21640629.2026.2657071
Towards trust-based performance evaluation in Swedish social services
Hasselblad, A. (2026) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2026.2677882
Data-Informed Educational Research and Evidence-Based Decision Making in Modern Education Systems
Sharma, S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2606-9.ch012
It Does Matter. A New Framework on the Influence of Policy Evaluation
Bundi, P., & Pattyn, V. (2026) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.70149
Who Is Nudge+ Done to and by Whom?
Banerjee, S., & John, P. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13261-1_7
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weiss, Carol H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Evaluation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-33
- ISSN
- 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0878
- OpenAlex
- W4245760083
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
- Keywords
- program evaluation, program decision-making, outcome indicators, research design, learning from evaluation, civil society, program organization, client groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review