Cited by 0Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing Restraint Through Individualized Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in an Inpatient Psychiatric Setting: An Exploratory Study

Ronan, Meredith, Therrien, Faith, Sears, Sandra, Meyer, Katherine, Depestre, Sohenga C., Rhoads, Christopher, Simonsen, Brandi·2026·Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

Abstract

Traditional responses to aggressive behavior in inpatient psychiatric settings have relied heavily on aversive and restrictive practices, such as restraint, despite the fact that such practices demonstrate limited effectiveness and are at odds with a rehabilitative, patient-centered mission. In response to such concerns, a growing number of researchers and practitioners have moved toward proactive, person-centered approaches to addressing challenging behavior, such as Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports is a multi-tiered framework for preventing and responding to challenging behavior by addressing environmental and contextual factors. This article describes an exploratory study examining the effect that implementation of individualized PBIS plans had on restraint events in an adult inpatient psychiatric hospital setting in the Northeastern United States. Results indicated a 76% reduction in restraints following implementation of individualized PBIS plans. Implications for future research and practice are explored as a means of improving clinical outcomes and quality of life of individuals in inpatient psychiatric settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10983007251335349

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allen D., McGill P., Smith M. (2016). The role of positive behavioral support in reducing the use of restrictive practices. In Liberman P., LaVigna G. W. (Eds.), New directions in the treatment of aggressive behavior (pp. 391–413). Nova Science Publishers.
  2. Higgins L. (2021). Secure unit: Positive behavioural support and restraint reduction in a unit for offenders with an intellectual disability and/or autism: Practice paper. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support, 11(1), 42–54.
  3. Tardiff K., Soloff P. H. (1984). American Psychiatric Association task force report on the psychiatric uses of seclusion and restraint. American Psychiatric Press.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Ronan, M., Therrien, F., Sears, S., Meyer, K., Depestre, S. C., Rhoads, C., & Simonsen, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ronan, Meredith
Venue
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
Published
2025-07-11
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 1098-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4772
OpenAlex
W4412198137
Cited by
0
References
17
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (H326S190001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, restraint reduction, physical restraint, aggression, behavioral problems, individualized intervention plan, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, de-escalation, person-centred care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review