Cited by 36Deception detection and forensic psychologyPolicing Practices and PerceptionsTorture, Ethics, and Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Training of Law Enforcement Officers in Detecting Deception: A Survey of Current Practices and Suggestions for Improving Accuracy

Abstract

The current study surveyed a random sample of Texas law enforcement officers (N = 109) about their training in detecting deception. Texas officers reported that their training entailed the equivalent of a 2-day, lecture-style workshop in the kinesic interview technique or Reid technique, two popular police training modules, with subsequent training more often the exception than the rule. The authors examine these results in light of previous social science research regarding officers’ accuracy in detecting deception and make suggestions for future training programs for police officers in this area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098611104273293

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913 · DOI
  2. Link, F. C., 1989, The kinesic interview technique
  3. Mangione, T. W., 1998, Handbook of applied social science research methods, 399
  4. Raskin, D. C., 1999, Expert Evidence, 7, 256
  5. Sapir, A., 1987, The LSI course on scientific content analysis (SCAN)
  6. Sealey, G., 2002, Confused confessions: Police techniques questioned when wrong guy comes clean
  7. Smith, N., 2001, Reading between the lines: An evaluation of the scientific content analysis technique (SCAN)
  8. Vrij, A., biennial conference of the American Psychology-Law Society

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Lyons, P. M., & Miller, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Midtown Psychological Associates, P.C.
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
Venue
Police Quarterly
Published
2006-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
275-290
ISSN
  • 1098-6111 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-745X
OpenAlex
W2086145997
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Police Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
Keywords
deception detection, police training, law enforcement officers, Reid technique, lie detection accuracy, training program improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review