Cited by 9Mechanical Behavior of CompositesFatigue and fracture mechanicsCellular and Composite Structures

Mode II fracture characterisation of a honeycomb/carbon-epoxy sandwich panel using the asymmetric end-notched flexure test

Open access
Moreira, RDF, de Moura, MFSF, Rocha, RJB, Oliveira, CFM·2022·Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials

Abstract

The objective of this work is to determine the fracture energy of a honeycomb/carbon-epoxy sandwich panel under mode II loading using the Asymmetric End-Notched Flexure (AENF) test. Experimental tests and numerical analyses aiming to validate all the procedures were performed. An equivalent crack length data reduction scheme was developed in order to simplify the experimental determination of the Resistance-curves ( R-curves) using exclusively the load-displacement ( P- δ) data. This strategy makes unnecessary the crack length monitoring during its propagation, which is hard to perform in mode II fracture tests. A mixed-mode I+II trapezoidal cohesive zone model was used for validating the proposed data reduction method. It was concluded that this methodology constitutes a suitable procedure for mode II fracture characterisation of debonding failure in composite sandwich panels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10996362221118031

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present finite element results for the load-displacement curve of the ADCB specimen with the cohesive zone model are in reasonable agreement with the experimental test presented in [62].

    “It can be seen that in Figure 5, the present results are in reasonable agreement with the experimental test, which is presented in [62].”
  • The finite element model's load-displacement curve for the sandwich structure using the ADCB specimen was validated against experimental data from the literature.

    “Validation study showing the load-displacement curve obtained from our finite element (FE) model (blue line) for the sandwich structure using the Asymmetric Double-Cantilever Beam (ADCB) specimen, compared to experimental data (black line) from the literature [62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreira, R., de Moura, M., Rocha, R., & Oliveira, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Mangement (PT)
Corresponding author
Moreira, RDF
Venue
Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials
Published
2022-08-05
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
2030-2046
ISSN
  • 1099-6362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-7972
OpenAlex
W4289981942
Cited by
9
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-033796)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
Keywords
mode II fracture, fracture energy, R-curve, equivalent crack length, debonding failure, composite sandwich panels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review