Cited by 43Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchStress Responses and CortisolTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Functional Status, Chronic Stress, and Cortisol Response After Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

Bay, Esther, Sikorskii, Alla, Fuli Gao·2009·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

It is well known that individuals experience difficulties with depressive symptoms and functional status after traumatic brain injury. However, it is unclear what the relationship is between these 2 phenomena and whether there is a biological explanation for. In this secondary analysis, we examined whether depressive symptoms explained postinjury functional status and whether chronic stress and salivary cortisol influenced this relationship. Participants included 75 persons within 24 months of their injury dates who were evaluated or treated in specialty clinics. All participants and a family member or significant other completed survey data, and 50 of the participants provided cortisol data. Results indicated that chronic stress, measured using Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, completely mediated the relationship between depressive symptoms, measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and psychological functioning, measured using the Patient Competency Rating Scale. Furthermore, those who provided cortisol data displayed hypocortisolemia in their 12-hr profile. Results from this analysis suggest that interventions focused on addressing the chronic stress experience may be important in limiting depressive symptoms and improving psychological functioning. Longitudinal study of this phenomenon is required to understand the progression of chronic stress after traumatic brain injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1099800408326453

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bay, E., Sikorskii, A., & Gao, F.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2008-11-17
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
213-225
ISSN
  • 1099-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4175
OpenAlex
W2091632183
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Research For Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, depressive symptoms, chronic stress, salivary cortisol, adrenal insufficiency, functional status, psychological functioning, mediation, stress biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain Injuries, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review