Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut Microbiome and Psychoneurological Symptoms Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Study

Lin, Yufen, Barandouzi, Zahra A., Houser, Madelyn C., Xiao, Canhua, Alese, Olatunji B., Mathebula, Sindile, Bai, Jinbing, Gbolahan, Olumide, Bruner, Deborah W.·2026·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: Survivorship in colorectal cancer (CRC) is often accompanied by co-occurring psychoneurological symptoms (PNS, e.g., fatigue, depression, pain), which negatively affect quality of life. Caregivers of individuals with CRC also experience PNS due to caregiving burdens, amplifying distress across the dyad. PNS may be influenced by the activity of the gut microbes. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine gut microbiome diversity and composition, and their association with PNS in CRC patients and their caregivers. Methods: Baseline data from a technology-based dyadic intervention were included in this analysis. Eleven patients and eight caregivers provided stool samples and completed PROMIS measures of PNS at baseline. Gut microbiome profiles were assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Alpha and beta diversity metrics and differential abundance analyses were used to characterize the gut microbiome and examine its associations with PNS. Results: Patients exhibited significantly lower microbial alpha diversity than caregivers in the full sample ( p = 0.033). Dyadic comparisons identified 92 differentially abundant taxa, with patients showing depletion of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa and enrichment of opportunistic taxa. Microbiome-symptom models revealed significant interactions by group (patient vs. caregiver) and taxa-level effects, with patients showing stronger positive associations between microbial alterations and higher PNS severity. Conclusions: CRC patients actively on chemotherapy demonstrated reduced diversity and depletion of beneficial taxa that may contribute to heightened PNS. Caregivers, despite healthier profiles, reported substantial symptom burden that were linked to gut microbiome features, highlighting dyadic interdependence and the potential for microbiome-targeted, dyadic interventions in survivorship care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10998004261447509

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1016/j.ccell.2025.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135424 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/cancers12092531 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11605-014-2645-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00520-023-08058-x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.2012.29 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3322/caac.21398 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30095-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/1028415X.2023.2277970 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00520-011-1092-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w · DOI · Paper page
  13. Eleuteri S., de Lima M. E. B., Falaschi P., Committee F. E. (2020). The psychological health of patients and their caregivers. In: Orthogeriatrics: The management of older patients with fragility fractures (pp. 223–237). Springer.
  14. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001429 · DOI
  15. 10.1188/04.ONF.1161-1169 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10482-020-01474-7 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41591-019-0377-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/acel.14315 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02013 · DOI
  20. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1118529 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s12160-015-9743-y · DOI
  22. 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318233a811 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/pon.2100 · DOI
  24. 10.1200/EDBK_159514 · DOI
  25. Li S., Liu J., Zheng X., Ren L., Yang Y., Li W., Fu W., Wang J., Du G. (2022). Tumorigenic bacteria in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms and treatments. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 19(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0651 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s00520-020-05946-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.3390/cancers15174301 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s42000-020-00236-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41577-024-01014-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.3390/nu15061496 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00520-015-2995-z · DOI
  33. 10.1101/gr.096651.109 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00520-013-2069-z · DOI
  35. PROMIS. (2025). PROMIS® score cut points. https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points
  36. 10.1016/j.cnur.2015.07.009 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/s41687-020-0181-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/mBio.01237-17 · DOI
  39. 10.3322/caac.21871 · DOI
  40. 10.3322/caac.21772 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/pon.4825 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00520-020-05739-9 · DOI
  43. 10.7554/eLife.00458 · DOI
  44. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000943 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/pon.5382 · DOI
  46. 10.3389/fphys.2021.715506 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41598-022-12037-3 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.07.025 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s11325-020-02246-3 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lin, Y., Barandouzi, Z. A., Houser, M. C., Xiao, C., Alese, O. B., Mathebula, S., Bai, J., Gbolahan, O., & Bruner, D. W.
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2026-04-24
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
525-537
ISSN
  • 1099-8004
  • 1552-4175
Cited by
0
References
4
Language
en
Funders
Oncology Nursing Foundation (2022 RE03)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut Microbiome and Psychoneurological Symptoms Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/10998004261447509
The paper
Lin, Y., Barandouzi, Z. A., Houser, M. C., Xiao, C., Alese, O. B., Mathebula, S., Bai, J., Gbolahan, O., & Bruner, D. W. (2026). Gut Microbiome and Psychoneurological Symptoms Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Pilot Study. Biological Research For Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004261447509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.