Cited by 28Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Daily Practice Managing Resistant Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity With Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol: Cannabidiol Oromucosal Spray: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Open access
Akgün, Katja, Essner, Ute, Seydel, Cordula, Ziemssen, Tjalf·2019·Journal of Central Nervous System Disease

Abstract

Background/purpose: Spasticity is one of the most common symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Conventional anti-spasticity agents have limitations in their efficacy and tolerability. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol (THC:CBD) spray, a cannabinoid-based medicine, is approved as an add-on therapy for MS spasticity not adequately controlled by other anti-spasticity medications. The results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated a reduction in the severity of spasticity and associated symptoms. However, RCTs do not always reflect real-life outcomes. We systematically reviewed the complementary evidence from non-interventional real-world studies. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all non-RCT publications on THC:CBD spray between 2011 and 2017. Data on study design, patient characteristics, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were extracted from those publications meeting our inclusion criteria. Results: In total, we reviewed 14 real-world publications including observational studies and treatment registries. The proportion of patients reaching the threshold of minimal clinical important difference (MCID), with at least a 20% reduction of the spasticity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score after 4 weeks ranged from 41.9% to 82.9%. The reduction in the mean NRS spasticity score after 4 weeks was maintained over 6-12 months. The average daily dose was five to six sprays. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol was well tolerated in the evaluated studies in the same way as in the RCTs. No new or unexpected adverse events or safety signals were reported in everyday clinical practice. Conclusions: The data evaluated in this systematic review provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of THC:CBD in clinical practice and confirm results obtained in RCTs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1179573519831997

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benefits of cannabinoids on muscle spasticity were more evident on patient than on physician ratings.

    “Benefits were more evident on patient than on physician ratings of muscle spasticity [91, 92].”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Introduction identifies the NRS as patient-rated and the MAS as physician-rated. Results (Spasticity outcome; page unavailable) report improvement on both measures, but do not say the benefit was more evident on patient ratings than on physician ratings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some cannabinoids (nabiximols, dronabinol, oral and oromucosal THC and THC/CBD, medicinal hemp) have small beneficial effects on muscle spasticity, primarily in patients with multiple sclerosis and possibly in those with spinal cord injuries and motor neuron disease.

    “Some cannabinoids (nabiximols, dronabinol, oral and oromucosal THC and THC/CBD, medicinal hemp) have small beneficial effects on muscle spasticity, primarily in patients with multiple sclerosis and possibly in those with spinal cord injuries and motor neuron disease.”

    From Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Introduction and Results > Spasticity outcome report improvement in multiple-sclerosis spasticity with THC:CBD oromucosal spray (nabiximols). The paper does not establish the claimed effects for the other listed cannabinoid preparations or for spinal cord injury or motor neuron disease; it also does not characterize the benefit as small. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1177/1352458517751049 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0022-510X(11)70009-0 · DOI
  3. 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-053 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000357739 · DOI
  5. 10.1586/erp.11.6 · DOI
  6. 10.1191/1352458504ms1085oa · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.004 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/ane.12202 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.007 · DOI
  10. 10.2217/cer.14.30 · DOI
  11. 10.3109/00207454.2012.762364 · DOI
  12. Beard S, 2003, Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England), 7
  13. Bavikatte G, 2009, Br J Med Pract, 2, 29
  14. 10.1080/09638280400014634 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.011 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/brain/awh675 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1352458516643600 · DOI
  18. 10.1586/ern.13.4 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/14651858.CD001332 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.08.026 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01639.x · DOI
  22. 10.1179/016164109X12590518685660 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03328.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/1352458511419700 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00415-012-6634-z · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s12916-016-0627-1 · DOI
  27. Garrison LPJr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, et al. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. Value Health. 2007;10(5):326–335. · DOI
  28. 10.4103/2229-516X.157148 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.02.007 · DOI
  30. 10.2147/TCRM.S115014 · DOI
  31. 10.1159/000444236 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312591 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0180651 · DOI
  34. 10.1159/000449413 · DOI
  35. 10.1159/000441619 · DOI
  36. 10.1159/000357427 · DOI
  37. 10.1159/000360285 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10072-015-2392-x · DOI
  39. 10.1002/jcph.670 · DOI
  40. Oreja-Guevara C, 2015, Clin Exp Pharmacol, 5, 184
  41. 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.06.014 · DOI
  42. 10.3109/00207454.2013.877460 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/ane.12287 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/s00115-017-0387-y · DOI
  46. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1159/000444234 · DOI
  48. 10.1186/s12883-016-0639-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akgün, K., Essner, U., Seydel, C., & Ziemssen, T.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • O.MEANY Consultancy GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
  • Almirall (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Essner, Ute
Venue
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
Published
2019-01
Volume
11
Pages
1179573519831997-1179573519831997
ISSN
1179-5735 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922483223
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Central Nervous System Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, spasticity, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, real-world effectiveness, treatment safety, numerical rating scale, minimal clinically important difference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review