Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Race, Class, Gender: Reclaiming Baggage in Fast Travelling Theories

Open access
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli·2005·European Journal of Women's Studies

Abstract

The article focuses on the temporal and epistemic economy connected to the transatlantic travels of the categorical triad of ‘race-class-gender’. It looks at conditions and forces that have fuelled the dynamics of the discourse on differences and inequality among women and analyses feminist discourse and its aporias as a particular environment for the travels of theories. Furthermore, it follows the changes the triad of ‘race-class-gender’ undergoes on its transatlantic route from the United States to a German-speaking context and it outlines the theoretical challenges connected to an intersectional perspective that aims to overcome a theoretical stagnation that itself finds symptomatic expression in the ritual citing of ‘race-class-gender’.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1350506805054267

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Acker, Joan, 2003, Achsen der Differenz. Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik II, 49
  2. Adorno, Theodor W., 1973, Negative Dialectics
  3. Adorno, Theodor W., 1995, Dialectics of Enlightenment
  4. Aulenbacher, Brigitte (2001) ‘Die “zweite Moderne”, ein herrenloses Konstrukt - Reichweite und Grenzen modernisierungstheoretischer Zeitdiagnosen’, pp. 188-225 in G.A. Knapp and A. Wetterer (eds) Soziale Verortung der Geschlechter. Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  5. Bal, Mieke, 2002, Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide
  6. Beck, Ulrich (1983) ‘Jenseits von Stand und Klasse?’, pp. 35-74 in R. Kreckel (ed.) Soziale Ungleichheiten. Soziale Welt, Sonderband 2. Göttingen: Schwartz.
  7. Bednarz-Braun, Iris and Ulrike Heß-Meining, eds (2004) Migration, Ethnie und Geschlecht. Theorieansätze - Forschungsstand - Forschungsperspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. · DOI
  8. Braidotti, Rosi, 2002, Thinking Differently: A Reader in European Women’s Studies
  9. Butler, Judith, 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
  10. Carroll, D., 1990, The States of Theory: History, Art, and Critical Discourse
  11. Clifford, James, 1992, Cultural Studies, 96
  12. Collins, Patricia Hill, 1990, Black Feminist Thought
  13. Combahee River Collective, 1982, But Some of Us Are Brave, 13
  14. Corsani, Antonella (2004) ‘Wissen und Arbeit im kognitiven Kapitalismus. Die Sackgassen der politischen Ökonomie’, pp. 156-75 in T. Atzert and J. Müller (eds) Immaterielle Arbeit und imperiale Souveränität. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  15. 10.1177/1350506802009003373 · DOI
  16. Derrida, Jaques, 1990, The States of Theory: History, Art, and Critical Discourse, 63
  17. Gümen, Sedef (1996) ‘Die sozialpolitische Konstruktion “kultureller Differenzen” in der bundesrepublikanischen Frauenforschung’, Beiträge zur feministischen Theorie und Praxis 19(42): 77-89.
  18. Gutiérrez Rodriguez, Encarnación (1999) Intellektuelle Migrantinnen - Subjektivitäten im Zeitalter der Globalisierung . Opladen: Leske und Budrich. · DOI
  19. Kamper, Dietmar (1998) ‘Die Gegenstandslosigkeit der Geisteswissenschaften und die neuen Brennpunkte der Industriegesellschaft’, pp. 25-33 in H. Reinalter and R. Benedikter (eds) Geisteswissenschaften im Spannungsfeld zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne. Vienna: Passagen-Verlag.
  20. King, Katie, 1994, Theory in its Feminist Travels: Conversations in US Women’s Movements
  21. Klinger, Cornelia (2003) ‘Ungleichheit in den Verhältnissen von Klasse, Rasse und Geschlecht’, pp. 14-49 in G.A. Knapp and A. Wetterer (eds) Achsen der Differenz. Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik II. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  22. 10.4135/9781446217122.n7 · DOI
  23. Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli (2001) ‘Grundlagenkritik und stille Post: Zur Debatte um einen Bedeutungsverlust der Kategorie “Geschlecht”’, pp. 53-75 in B. Heintz (ed.) Geschlechtersoziologie. Sonderheft der Köner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 41. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  24. Latour, Bruno (1995) Wir sind nie modern gewesen. Versuch einer symmetrischen Anthropologie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. · DOI
  25. 10.1177/14647000122229398 · DOI
  26. Said, Edward, 1983, The World, the Text and the Critic
  27. Slaughter, Sheila, 1997, Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University
  28. Weber, Lynn, 2000, Understanding Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality: A Conceptual Framework
  29. 10.1080/09502389300490151 · DOI

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Knapp, G.-A.
Venue
European Journal of Women's Studies
Published
2005-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
249-265
ISSN
  • 1350-5068 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7420
OpenAlex
W2140669169
Cited by
373
References
3
FWCI
27.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race, Class, Gender: Reclaiming Baggage in Fast Travelling Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1350506805054267
The paper
Knapp, G.-A. (2005). Race, Class, Gender: Reclaiming Baggage in Fast Travelling Theories. European Journal of Women's Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805054267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.