Cited by 25Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender, Feminism, and MediaGender and Feminist Studies

The problems with feminist nostalgia: Intersectionality and white popular feminism

Open access
Evans, Elizabeth, Bussey-Chamberlain, Prudence·2021·European Journal of Women's Studies

Abstract

Contemporary feminisms are ineluctably drawn into comparisons with historic discourses, forms of praxis and tactical repertoires. While this can underscore points of continuity and commonality in ongoing struggles, it can also result in nostalgia for a more unified and purposeful feminist politics. Kate Eichhorn argues that our interest in nostalgia should be to understand feminist temporalities, and in particular the specific context in which we experience such nostalgia. Accordingly, this article takes up the idea that neoliberalism and populism, which have given rise to both neoliberal feminism and femonationalism, have produced a series of contestations regarding the purpose and nature of feminist politics, as expressed by white popular feminism in the United Kingdom. This article examines two dimensions of feminist nostalgia: first, nostalgia for a more radical form of feminist politics – one not co-opted by neoliberal forces, not individualistic and not centred around online activism; and second, a nostalgia for the idea of ‘sisterhood’ – a time before white feminists were called upon to engage with intersectionality or be inclusive of trans-women. We analyse these themes through analysis of white popular feminism produced in the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2020, cautioning against a feminist nostalgia which neglects to engage with the radical politics of intersectionality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13505068211032058

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • “We finish with a concluding discussion, cautioning against white feminist nostalgia, which we argue can serve to undermine the radical possibilities of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1990; Collins and Bilge, 2016).”
    Background
  • The Cultural Politics of Emotion

    Ahmed, S. M. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203700372 · Cited by 6,447 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Feminist scholars have instead focused on ‘storytelling’ (Hemmings, 2011; Wånggren, 2016), examining shared experiences, memories and histories, without, necessarily, invoking nostalgia (Ahmed, 2004; Polletta, 2009; Scott, 2011), a task which this article is concerned with.”
    Background
  • The future of nostalgia

    Wheeler, D. (2016) · doi:10.7765/9781526107732.00014 · Cited by 1,460 · cited 5×

    “Drawing in particular upon the work of Svetlana Boym (2001, 2007), this article proposes a new framework for thinking through different dimensions to feminist nostalgia, specifically concerning a loss of radicalism and sisterhood.1 We situate this current ‘wave’ of feminist nostalgia for radicalism and sisterhood, as…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia.

    Fox, W. S., & Davis, F. D. (1981) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578475 · Cited by 1,282 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Nostalgia is a social emotion grounded in the politics of timekeeping; one which, while looking backwards, is rooted in, and produced by, fears and anxieties in the present (Davis, 1979).”
    Background
  • Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny

    Banet-Weiser, S. (2018) · doi:10.1215/9781478002772 · Cited by 1,000 · cited 2× · see citing works

    “Following Banet-Weiser (2018), we define popular feminism as that which is produced and circulated via popular and mainstream sources, translating into ‘accepted’ feminist discourse.”
    BackgroundMethod
  • The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism

    Rottenberg, C. (2013) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2013.857361 · Cited by 980 · cited 5× · see citing works

    “The current wave of feminist nostalgia expressed in UK white popular feminism is, we argue, partially produced by the twin crises of neoliberalism and populism and more specifically, the subsequent spawning of both neoliberal feminism and femonationalism.2 Catherine Rottenberg (2014) conceptualises neoliberal feminism…”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis

    Guest, C. (2014) · European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology · doi:10.1080/23254823.2014.948028 · Cited by 756 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…for marginalised women (Bassel and Emejulu, 2017); the problematic promotion of market-based solutions for social and political problems (Fraser, 2013); the integration and normalisation of consumerism as aspirational feminism (Rottenberg, 2014); and its damaging implications for…”
    Background
  • Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism

    Korolczuk, E., & Graff, A. (2018) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/696691 · Cited by 561 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…and revived old threats, including the use of gender equality and women’s rights to advance anti-Islam agendas (Farris, 2017; Lépinard, 2020); attacks on women’s reproductive rights (Franklin and Ginsburg, 2019); and the demonization of refugee women (Korolczuk and Graff, 2018; Schuster, 2020).”
    Background
  • Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique

    Mohanty, C. T. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669576 · Cited by 420 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…and Emejulu, 2017); the problematic promotion of market-based solutions for social and political problems (Fraser, 2013); the integration and normalisation of consumerism as aspirational feminism (Rottenberg, 2014); and its damaging implications for radical intellectual critique (Mohanty, 2013).”
    Background
  • “Feminist scholars have instead focused on ‘storytelling’ (Hemmings, 2011; Wånggren, 2016), examining shared experiences, memories and histories, without, necessarily, invoking nostalgia (Ahmed, 2004; Polletta, 2009; Scott, 2011), a task which this article is concerned with.”
    Background
  • Minority Women and Austerity

    Bassel, L., & Emejulu, A. (2017) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447327134.001.0001 · Cited by 201 · cited 4× · see citing works

    “Feminism is relatively high profile in the United Kingdom, and there has been a sustained period of feminist activism since 2010 (Chamberlain, 2017; Bassel and Emejulu, 2017; Evans, 2015; Phipps, 2020), as such, there is a well-established number of feminist journalists and commentators producing…”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • A Note on Nostalgia

    Turner, B. (1987) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/026327687004001008 · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Writing in the late 1980s, Bryan Turner (1987) identified the multi-faceted nature of the concept, which intimates historical decline, the absence of moral certainty, the disappearance of genuine social relationships and a weakening of personal authenticity.”
    Background
  • Feeling Women's Liberation

    Hesford, V. (2013) · doi:10.1215/9780822397519 · Cited by 127 · cited 2×

    “Although Eichhorn identities many feminist theorists working on temporality and the past distancing themselves from nostalgia, including but not limited to Hesford (2013), Freeman (2010) and Hemmings (2011), she offers up an ambiguous possibility for the affect.”
    Background
  • The Fantasy of Feminist History

    Sørensen, M. (2013) · doi:10.1080/13507486.2013.792612 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×

    “Feminist scholars have instead focused on ‘storytelling’ (Hemmings, 2011; Wånggren, 2016), examining shared experiences, memories and histories, without, necessarily, invoking nostalgia (Ahmed, 2004; Polletta, 2009; Scott, 2011), a task which this article is concerned with.”
    Background
  • An Affinity of Hammers

    Ahmed, S. M. (2016) · TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1215/23289252-3334151 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Certainly, feminism has been historically positioned as somehow above the inequalities and exclusionary norms of wider society, yet this particular moment has ushered in a politics reflective of societal divisions and exclusions (Ahmed, 2016).”
    Background
  • “However, feminist scholars have hitherto been reluctant to engage with the idea of nostalgia, unsurprising perhaps given its implicitly pejorative nature (Bonnett, 2009); indeed, Kate Eichhorn (2015) describes nostalgia as ‘taboo’, a ‘feeling that dare not speak its name’.”
    Background
  • Social Movements and Collective Memory

    Kubal, T., & Becerra, R. (2014) · doi:10.1111/soc4.12166 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×

    “These dialogues are, on one level, an exercise in history and memory, one undertaken by activists across social movements (Kubal and Becerra, 2014).”
    Background
  • “For feminists, such a dialogue can challenge, disrupt and/or sustain contemporary praxis (Hemmings, 2011), with the past sometimes invoked to reject or repudiate the present (Funk, 2013) and vice versa (Henry, 2004).”
    Background
  • Reproductive Politics in the Age of Trump and Brexit

    Franklin, S., & Ginsburg, F. (2019) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca34.1.02 · Cited by 46 · cited 2×

    “…and revived old threats, including the use of gender equality and women’s rights to advance anti-Islam agendas (Farris, 2017; Lépinard, 2020); attacks on women’s reproductive rights (Franklin and Ginsburg, 2019); and the demonization of refugee women (Korolczuk and Graff, 2018; Schuster, 2020).”
    Background
  • “Feminist scholars have instead focused on ‘storytelling’ (Hemmings, 2011; Wånggren, 2016), examining shared experiences, memories and histories, without, necessarily, invoking nostalgia (Ahmed, 2004; Polletta, 2009; Scott, 2011), a task which this article is concerned with.”
    Background
  • What is Radical Politics Today

    Pugh, J. (2009) · doi:10.1057/9780230251144_1 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×

    “We use the term radical here not in relation to ‘R’adical feminism, but rather as a descriptor to denote an ‘alternative view of the world’, radical politics identifies the problem but effectively changes the way in which society is structured (Pugh, 2009).”
    Method
  • Feminism's there: On post-ness and nostalgia

    Eichhorn, K. (2015) · doi:10.1177/1464700115604127 · Cited by 20 · cited 2×

    “However, feminist scholars have hitherto been reluctant to engage with the idea of nostalgia, unsurprising perhaps given its implicitly pejorative nature (Bonnett, 2009); indeed, Kate Eichhorn (2015) describes nostalgia as ‘taboo’, a ‘feeling that dare not speak its name’.”
    Background
  • Feminist Trouble

    Lépinard, É. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190077150.001.0001 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…new challenges and revived old threats, including the use of gender equality and women’s rights to advance anti-Islam agendas (Farris, 2017; Lépinard, 2020); attacks on women’s reproductive rights (Franklin and Ginsburg, 2019); and the demonization of refugee women (Korolczuk and Graff,…”
    Background
  • Me Not You: The trouble with mainstream feminism

    Taylor, F. (2020) · Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review · doi:10.53841/bpspowe.2020.3.1-2.96 · Cited by 12 · cited 4×

    “…high profile in the United Kingdom, and there has been a sustained period of feminist activism since 2010 (Chamberlain, 2017; Bassel and Emejulu, 2017; Evans, 2015; Phipps, 2020), as such, there is a well-established number of feminist journalists and commentators producing popular feminism.”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • “…and revived old threats, including the use of gender equality and women’s rights to advance anti-Islam agendas (Farris, 2017; Lépinard, 2020); attacks on women’s reproductive rights (Franklin and Ginsburg, 2019); and the demonization of refugee women (Korolczuk and Graff, 2018; Schuster, 2020).”
    Background
  • Backward glances: Feminism, nostalgia and Joan Braderman’s The Heretics (2009)

    Meagher, M., & Runyon, R. (2017) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700117721883 · Cited by 2 · cited 2× · see citing works

    “…us to take seriously the capacity of feminist attachments to the past to function as rich affective resources for our present and imagined future’ (Meagher and Runyon, 2009: 344); they describe nostalgia as ‘a turn to the past to locate resources for identity, agency or community, all of…”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

11 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, E., & Bussey-Chamberlain, P.
Affiliations
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
Corresponding author
Evans, Elizabeth
Venue
European Journal of Women's Studies
Published
2021-08
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
353-368
ISSN
  • 1350-5068 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7420
OpenAlex
W3167945752
Cited by
25
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Women s Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
intersectionality, neoliberal feminism, femonationalism, sisterhood, digital activism, feminist politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review