Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny
Abstract
In 2018, we are living in a moment in North Amer i ca and Eu rope in which feminism has become, somewhat incredibly, popu lar.It feels as if everywhere you turn, there is an expression of feminism-on a T-shirt, in a movie, in the lyr ics of a pop song, in an inspirational Instagram post, in an awards ceremony speech.Feminism is "popu lar" in at least three senses: One, feminism manifests in discourses and practices that are circulated in popu lar and commercial media, such as digital spaces like blogs, Instagram, and Twitter, as well as broadcast media.As such, these discourses have an accessibility that is not confined to academic enclaves or niche groups.Two, the "popu lar" of popu lar feminism signifies the condition of being liked or admired by like-minded people and groups, as popularity.And three, for me the "popu lar" is, as cultural theorist Stuart Hall (1998) argued, a terrain of strug gle, a space where competing demands for power battle it out.This means that there are many diff er ent feminisms that circulate in popu lar culture in the current moment, and some of these feminisms become more vis i ble than others.Popu lar feminism is networked across all media platforms, some connecting with synergy, others struggling for priority and visibility.Popu lar feminism has, in many ways, allowed us to imagine a culture in which feminism, in every form, doesn't have to be defended; it is accessible, even admired.But feminism isn't the only popu lar phenomenon we need to c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The manosphere's activities have been influenced, shaped, and increased by the perceived need to counterbalance the growth of online feminist discourses such as #MeToo.
“Even though the manosphere has existed since the early 2000s, its activities have been arguably influenced, shaped, and increased by the perceived need for counterbalancing the growth of online feminist discourses (Sarah Banet-Weiser 2018).”
From “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere (2023) · cites this paper as Sarah Banet-Weiser 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere
Dickel, V., & Evolvi, G. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819884635 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Blackfishing on Instagram: influencing and the commodification of black urban aesthetics
Stevens, W. E. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211038236 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The problems with feminist nostalgia: Intersectionality and white popular feminism
Evans, E., & Bussey-Chamberlain, P. (2021) · European Journal of Women's Studies · doi:10.1177/13505068211032058 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Following Banet-Weiser (2018), we define popular feminism as that which is produced and circulated via popular and mainstream sources, translating into ‘accepted’ feminist discourse.”
BackgroundMethodMisogyny and the construction of toxic masculinity in the Spanish Manosphere (Burbuja.info)
Lacalle, C., Gómez-Morales, B., & Vicent-Ibáñez, M. (2023) · El Profesional de la información · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.mar.15 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Unpopular Feminism: Popular Culture and Gender Politics in Digital China
Liao, S. (2025) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/20570473241268066 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Draper, N. A. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220945354 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
This hashtag is just my style: popular feminism & digital fashion activism
Horton, K., & Street, P. (2021) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2021.1993573 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Exploring Incel Motivations and the Relationship to Gender-Based Violence: A Scoping Review
Fostier, A., Hallett, N., Jordan, G., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2026) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380261460442
- Authors
- Banet-Weiser, S.
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W4238600264
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 197 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 70.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- popular feminism, feminism, popular culture, media representation of feminism, social media, Instagram, Twitter, blogs, Stuart Hall
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review