CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297Innovative Education and Learning PracticesInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks

Blackler, Frank, Crump, Norman, McDonald, Seonaidh·2000·Organization
DOI 10.1177/135050840072005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper analyses practice as activity and develops a frame-work for analysing organizations as networks of activity systems. The approach is applied in a study of a high technology company. Key tensions in the organization are outlined and a comparative study of three strategy development teams is described. Activity theory provides the means to analyse organizations as distributed, decentred and emergent knowledge systems. It is suggested that the processes of `perspective making', `perspective taking' and `perspective shaping' are central to the integration of different expert groups that need to co-operate in the pursuit of multiple, perhaps competing, objectives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135050840072005

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bucciarelli, L.L., 1996, Designing Engineers
  2. Engeström, Y., 1987, Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research
  3. Engeström, Y., Critical Management Studies Workshop at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
  4. Hirschhorn, L., 1993, The Workplace Within
  5. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1981, Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies
  6. Scribner, S., 1986, Practical Intelligence: Nature, Origins and Competence in the Everday World
  7. Vygotsky, L., 1978, Mind in Society
  8. Vygotsky, L., 1986, Thought and Language

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 297

Related

Metadata

Authors
Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Blackler, Frank
  • Crump, Norman
  • McDonald, Seonaidh
ORCID
Venue
Organization
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
277-300
ISSN
  • 1350-5084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7323
DOI
10.1177/135050840072005
OpenAlex
W2005537099
Cited by
297
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 11
FWCI
27.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Organization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
activity theory, activity systems, organizational networks, perspective taking, knowledge systems, high-tech enterprises, organizational tensions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review