Cited by 113Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of CSF oligoclonal bands and different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to CDMS

Tintoré, M, Rovira, A, Brieva, L, Grivé, E, Jardí, R, Borrás, C, Montalban, X·2001·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Aim of the study To evaluate and compare the capacity of oligoclonal bands (OB) and three sets of MR imaging criteria to predict the conversion of clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). Patients and methods One hundred and twelve patients with CIS were prospectively studied with MR imaging and determination of OB. Based on the clinical follow-up (conversion or not conversion to CDMS), we calculated the sensitivity, specificity accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of the OB, and MR imaging criteria proposed by Paty et al, Fazekas et al and Barkhof et al. Results CDMS developed in 26 (23.2%) patients after a mean follow-up of 31 months (range 12-62). OB were positive in 70 (62.5%) patients and were associated with a higher risk of developing CDMS. OB showed a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 43%, accuracy of 52%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 30% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88%. Paty and Fazekas criteria showed the same results with a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 51%, accuracy of 57%, positive predictive value of 32% and negative predictive value of 88%. Barkhof criteria showed a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 70%, accuracy of 69%, PPV of 40% and NPV of 87%. The greatest accuracy was achieved when patients with positive OB and three or four Barkhof's criteria were selected. Conclusions We observed a high prevalence of OB in CIS. OB and MR imaging (Paty's and Fazekas' criteria) have high sensi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135245850100700603

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies provide evidence that in adult patients with CIS, CSF OCBs are an independent predictor of the risk of a second attack when controlling for demographic, clinical, treatment, and MRI variables.

    “Multiple studies provide evidence that in adult patients with CIS, CSF OCBs are an independent predictor of the risk of a second attack when controlling for demographic, clinical, treatment, and MRI variables. 61-69”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1093/brain/112.1.133 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/archneur.57.7.974 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/WNL.50.3.708 · DOI
  4. 10.1056/NEJM199202273260901 · DOI
  5. 10.1136/jnnp.49.2.124 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jnnp.51.12.1569 · DOI
  7. Tintore M, 1999, Med Clin (Barc), 112, 693
  8. 10.1212/WNL.38.2.180 · DOI
  9. 10.1212/WNL.38.12.1822 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.1997.tb00406.x · DOI
  11. 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tintore M, 2000, Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 702
  13. 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1056/NEJM200009283431301 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04725-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1212/WNL.46.2.368 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb04944.x · DOI
  18. Ghezzi A, 1999, JNeurol, 246, 770
  19. Falip M, 2000, Rev Neurol (Paris), 156, P226
  20. 10.1007/BF00868339 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/ana.410260508 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/ana.410290206 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/WNL.44.4.635 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/brain/121.3.495 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tintoré, M., Rovira, A., Brieva, L., Grivé, E., Jardí, R., Borrás, C., & Montalban, X.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Magnetic Resonance Unit (Department of Radiology), Vall d'Hebron University Hospitals, Barcelona, Spain
  • Unit of Clinical Neuroimmunology (Department of Neurology), Vall d'Hebron University Hospitals, Barcelona, Spain
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2001-12
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
359-363
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2117695410
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
clinically isolated syndrome, conversion to multiple sclerosis, oligoclonal bands, cerebrospinal fluid, MRI criteria, Barkhof criteria, diagnostic accuracy, demyelinating disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syndrome, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Oligoclonal Bands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review