The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability
Abstract
This study evaluated the gait and balance performance of two clinically distinct groups of recently diagnosed and minimally impaired multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale range 0- 2.5), compared to control subjects. Ten MS patients with mild pyramidal signs (Pyramidal Functional Systems 1.0), 10 MS patients with no pyramidal signs (Pyramidal Functional Systems 0) and 20 age- and gender-matched control subjects were assessed using laboratory-based gait analysis and clinical balance measures. Both MS groups demonstrated reduced speed and stride length ( P < 0.001), and prolonged double limb support ( P<0.02), compared to the control group, along with alterations in the timing of ankle muscle activity, and the pattern of ankle motion during walking, which occurred independent of gait speed. The pyramidal MS group walked with reduced speed ( P=0.03) and stride length ( P=0.04), and prolonged double limb support ( P=0.01), compared to the non-pyramidal group. Both MS groups demonstrated concomitant balance impairment, performing poorly on the Functional Reach Test compared to the control group ( P<0.05). The identification of incipient gait and balance impairment in MS patients with recent disease onset suggests that motor function may begin to deteriorate in the early stages of the disease, even in the absence of clinical signs of pyramidal dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Cited by
Postural Control in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Fall Prevention
Cameron, M. H., & Lord, S. (2010) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-010-0128-0 · Cited by 299
Balance, gait, and falls in multiple sclerosis
(2018) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63916-5.00015-x · Cited by 271
Examining trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis.
Schirda, B., Nicholas, J. A., & Prakash, R. S. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000215 · Cited by 58
Tulipani, L. J., Meyer, B., Allen, D., Solomon, A. J., & McGinnis, R. S. (2022) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.016 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C. L., Phillips, B. A., Kilpatrick, T. J., Butzkueven, H., Tubridy, N., McDonald, E., & Galea, M. P.
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 620-628
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2161634194
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458506070658
- The paper
- Martin, C. L., Phillips, B. A., Kilpatrick, T. J., Butzkueven, H., Tubridy, N., McDonald, E., & Galea, M. P. (2006). Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506070658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.