Cited by 59Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Fatigue, depression and progression in multiple sclerosis

Koch, M, Uyttenboogaart, M, van Harten, A, Heerings, M, De Keyser, J·2008·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of fatigue and depression on disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), and the long-term prognosis of these symptoms. Methods 228 patients with MS were investigated for fatigue and depression with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). These patients regularly attended the MS clinic, where disability scores and the development of secondary progression were monitored. After 10 years, the 149 patients remaining from the original cohort were asked to participate in a repeat assessment of fatigue and depression and 96 (64%) could be re-evaluated. In relapsing-remitting patients, the influence of baseline fatigue and depression on the risk of secondary progression during the following 10 years was assessed with survival analyses. In the whole patient group, we investigated the influence of baseline fatigue and depression on progression of disability at 10 years. We also investigated differences in fatigue, depression and disability scores between baseline and 10 years. Results Fatigue and depression at baseline did not predict the development of secondary progression or progression of disability. Most patients who were fatigued or depressed at baseline remained so at 10 years, and the majority of patients not experiencing these symptoms remained free of them. FSS and CES-D scores were not significantly different between baseline and 10 years, while disability scores significantly inc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458508088937

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koch, M., Uyttenboogaart, M., van Harten, A., Heerings, M., & De Keyser, J.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Koch, M
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2008-07
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
815-822
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2104729674
Cited by
59
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, fatigue, depression, disease progression, disability progression, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, long-term prognosis, symptom persistence, Fatigue Severity Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review