Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grey matter volume in a large cohort of MS patients: relation to MRI parameters and disability

Roosendaal, Stefan D, Bendfeldt, Kerstin, Vrenken, Hugo, Polman, Chris H, Borgwardt, Stefan, Radue, Ernst W, Kappos, Ludwig, Pelletier, Daniel, Hauser, Stephen L, Matthews, Paul M, Barkhof, Frederik, Geurts, Jeroen JG·2011·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background: Although grey matter damage in multiple sclerosis is currently recognized, determinants of grey matter volume and its relationship with disability are not yet clear. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to measure grey and white matter volumes across different disease phenotypes; identify MRI parameters associated with grey matter volume; and study grey and white matter volume as explanatory variables for clinical impairment. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study in which MRI data of 95 clinically isolated syndrome, 657 relapsing–remitting, 125 secondary-progressive and 50 primary-progressive multiple sclerosis patients from three centres were acquired. Grey and white matter volumes were determined, together with T2 and T1 lesion volumes. Physical disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale, cognitive impairment with the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task. Data were analysed using multiple regression. Results: Grey matter volume was lower in relapsing–remitting patients (mean [SD]: 0.80 [0.05] L) than in clinically isolated syndrome patients (0.82 [0.05] L), and even greater relative atrophy was found in secondary-progressive patients (0.77 [0.05] L). In contrast, white matter volume in secondary-progressive patients was comparable to that in relapsing–remitting patients. Grey matter volume was the strongest independent predictor of physical disability and cognitive impairment, and was associated with both T2 and T1 lesion volume. Conclusions: Our findings show that grey matter volume is lower in secondary-progressive than in relapsing–remitting disease. Grey matter volume explained physical and cognitive impairment better than white matter volume, and is itself associated with T2 and T1 lesion volume.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458511404916

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Roosendaal, S. D., Bendfeldt, K., Vrenken, H., Polman, C. H., Borgwardt, S., Radue, E. W., Kappos, L., Pelletier, D., Hauser, S. L., Matthews, P. M., Barkhof, F., & Geurts, J. J.
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2011-05-17
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1098-1106
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2106649915
Cited by
187
References
5
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grey matter volume in a large cohort of MS patients: relation to MRI parameters and disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458511404916
The paper
Roosendaal, S. D., Bendfeldt, K., Vrenken, H., Polman, C. H., Borgwardt, S., Radue, E. W., Kappos, L., Pelletier, D., Hauser, S. L., Matthews, P. M., Barkhof, F., & Geurts, J. J. (2011). Grey matter volume in a large cohort of MS patients: relation to MRI parameters and disability. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511404916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.