Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients
Abstract
Background Incidental T2 white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in headache patients on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may prompt concern for demyelinating disease. Objective We reviewed brain MRI studies in patients with headaches without known demyelinating disease to determine the prevalence meeting imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) using two different definitions of "juxtacortical" and "periventricular". Methods Consecutive patients undergoing pre- and post-contrast MRI for headaches over a 25-month period were retrospectively identified. Exclusions included patients under age 10 and over 55 years or with known demyelinating disorder. Patients were classified as meeting: 1) Barkhof and 2) 2010 McDonald dissemination in space criteria for MS based on: FLAIR/T2 scans for WMH and enhanced T1-weighted images for enhancement. Both groups were further differentiated by defining "periventricular" and "juxtacortical" as WMH contacting ventricle and cortex (Barkhof "touching", McDonald "touching") versus WMH within 3 mm (Barkhof--3 mm, McDonald--3 mm). Results 326/564 (58%) studies met inclusion criteria. WMH prevalence was 168/326 (51.53%). Barkhof "touching" criteria were met in 4/168 (2.4%) and in 12/168 (7.1%) of the 3 mm group. McDonald criteria were met in 41/168 (24.4%) for "touching" and 58/168 (34.5%) for 3 mm, respectively. Conclusion Barkhof and McDonald criteria were met in 2.4-7.1% and 24.4-34.5%, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MRI in patients with small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, other inflammatory and noninflammatory disorders affecting white matter, and even in healthy subjects (especially in older age groups), may show brain lesions that fulfil MRI criteria for MS.
“MRI in patients with small-vessel cerebrovascular disease, other inflammatory and noninflammatory disorders affecting white matter (see examples in Tables 2 & 3), and even in healthy subjects (especially in older age groups), may show brain lesions that fulfil MRI criteria for MS [21][22][23][24]”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
The typical demyelinating lesions that characterise RIS need to be carefully differentiated from small-vessel cerebrovascular disease and nonspecific white matter lesions (the latter being common in people with migraine).
“The typical demyelinating lesions that characterise RIS need to be carefully differentiated from small-vessel cerebrovascular disease and nonspecific white matter lesions (the latter being common in people with migraine 21,24 ).”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802 · see citing works
Bot, J. C. J., Barkhof, F., à Nijeholt, G. L., van Schaardenburg, D., Voskuyl, A. E., Ader, H. J., Pijnenburg, J. A. L., Polman, C. H., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Vermeulen, E. G. J., et al. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2231010707 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers
Kaisey, M., Solomon, A. J., Luu, M., Giesser, B. S., & Sicotte, N. L. (2019) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.048 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, S., Kullnat, J., Bourdette, D., Simon, J., Kraemer, D. F., Murchison, C., & Hamilton, B. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Seattle Radiologists, USA
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-02-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1101-1105
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2172244007
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
- Keywords
- dissemination in space, multiple sclerosis, white matter hyperintensities, headache, Barkhof criteria, McDonald criteria, juxtacortical lesions, periventricular lesions, demyelinating disease, prevalence, incidental MRI findings
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Headache, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review