The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CSF oligoclonal bands are important in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, unreasonably downplayed by the McDonald Criteria 2010: Commentary
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The McDonald 2010 criteria do not mandate a CSF examination and there is much variation between neurologists as to how often a lumbar puncture is done in the diagnosis of MS.
“The McDonald 2010 criteria do not mandate a CSF examination and there is much variation between neurologists as to how often a lumbar puncture is done in in the diagnosis of MS. 66”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [66]
The role of spinal cord imaging and CSF examination in MS diagnosis is particularly controversial.
“The role of spinal cord imaging 65 and CSF examination 66 in MS diagnosis is particularly controversial.”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelly S, 2012, Mult Scler J
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182858cbc · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000280576.73609.c6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.2008.150896 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchinson, M.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Hutchinson, Michael
- ORCID
- Hutchinson, Michael
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 719-720
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2041789575
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- oligoclonal bands, cerebrospinal fluid, multiple sclerosis diagnosis, diagnostic criteria
- MeSH terms
- Health Status Indicators, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Oligoclonal Bands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
