Cited by 14Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination in space in Korean patients with clinically isolated syndromes

Abstract

We investigated the validity of the 2005 and 2010 McDonald magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for dissemination in space (DIS) to predict the conversion of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) in 94 Korean patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of the 2005, 2010 McDonald DIS criteria were comparable to those observed in the Caucasian population. This finding suggests that after careful exclusion of alternative explanations, particularly neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD), both the 2005 and 2010 McDonald DIS criteria are also useful to predict conversion to CDMS in Korean patients with CIS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458513496881

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI criteria were tested and validated in European populations with a high incidence of MS, although recent studies investigating the McDonald 2010 criteria in CIS cohorts in Latin America and Asia have reported a similarly good performance.

    “Secondly, MRI criteria were tested and validated in European populations with a high incidence of MS 25 , although recent studies investigating the McDonald 2010 criteria in CIS cohorts in Latin America 26 and Asia 27 have reported a similarly good performance.”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [27]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000216139.44259.74 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824f8069 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tintoré M, 2000, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 702
  7. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073247 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.49 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huh, S.-Y., Kim, S.-H., Kim, W., Lee, S.-H., Park, M. S., Ahn, S.-W., Kim, B.-J., Cho, J.-Y., & Kim, H. J.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • Yeungnam University College (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR)
  • Korea University Medical Center (KR)
  • Inje University (KR)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2013-07-25
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
492-495
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2057907524
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
clinically isolated syndrome, dissemination in space, McDonald criteria, multiple sclerosis, conversion to multiple sclerosis, diagnostic accuracy, neuromyelitis optica, NMO spectrum disorders, Korean patients, magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Reproducibility of Results, Disease Progression, Asian People, Young Adult, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review