The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis diagnostics in Central Russia: Sensitivity and specificity
Open accessAbstract
Background: The 2010 revised McDonald criteria were developed with data gathered from Caucasian European and North American populations, and their applicability has been questioned for the Russian population. Objective: The objective of this report is to compare the specificity, accuracy, sensitivity and predictive value of MRI criteria incorporated to the new (2010) and old (2005) McDonald criteria for early multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostics in the Nyzhnyi Novgorod (Russia) population. Methods: A total of 103 patients with symptoms suggestive of MS were recruited from 2008 to 2011 retrospectively. Patients were followed up until MS was confirmed or other proved diagnoses were determined. Their baseline and follow-up brain and spinal cord MRIs were retrospectively evaluated. Sixty-two patients (60%) converted to MS during the follow-up period (mean in 11±4.2 months). Results: In 41 cases (38%) diagnoses another than MS were established. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of the revised MRI criteria were 74%, 93%, 82%, 94%, 70%, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of our study, we conclude that the ability of the revised MRI criteria for early MS diagnostics in the Russian population is approximately similar to that determined by the international panel in Europe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, 22-24 Middle Eastern, 25,26 and Latin American 27 populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRI criteria for MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes
Montalban, X., Tintoré, M., Swanton, J., Barkhof, F., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Frederiksen, J., Kappos, L., Palace, J., Polman, C., et al. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181cec45c · Cited by 252
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Noseworthy JH, 2008, Multiple Sclerosis, 303
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- Завалишин И А, Переседова АВ, Стойда НИ. и соавт. Диагностика и лечение рассеянного склероза. Журн неврол и психиатр им С. С. Корсакова 2011; 6: 89–96.
- 10.1016/S0303-8467(02)00039-2 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073247 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458511417828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1352458513475492 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.20632 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Belova, A., Shalenkov, IV, Shakurova, D., & Boyko, A.
- Affiliations
- Regional Multiple Sclerosis Center, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1896-1899
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2061116116
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, MRI diagnostic criteria, sensitivity and specificity, early diagnosis, conversion to multiple sclerosis, Russian population, Nizhny Novgorod, diagnostic accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Russia, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spinal Cord, Cohort Studies, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
