The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis: Seeing differences through optical coherence tomography
Open accessAbstract
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that preferentially targets the optic nerves and spinal cord. The clinical presentation may suggest multiple sclerosis (MS), but a highly specific serum autoantibody against the astrocytic water channel aquaporin-4 present in up to 80% of NMO patients enables distinction from MS. Optic neuritis may occur in either condition resulting in neuro-anatomical retinal changes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become a useful tool for analyzing retinal damage both in MS and NMO. Numerous studies showed that optic neuritis in NMO typically results in more severe retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer thinning and more frequent development of microcystic macular edema than in MS. Furthermore, while patients’ RNFL thinning also occurs in the absence of optic neuritis in MS, subclinical damage seems to be rare in NMO. Thus, OCT might be useful in differentiating NMO from MS and serve as an outcome parameter in clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OCT findings may assist in differentiating MS from NMOSD.
“OCT findings may assist in differentiating MS from NMOSD 80”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders
Sato, D. K., Callegaro, D., Lana-Peixoto, M. A., Waters, P. J., Jorge, F. M. D. H., Takahashi, T., Nakashima, I., Apostolos-Pereira, S. L., Talim, N., Simm, R. F., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000101 · Cited by 850
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 79
- 10.1212/WNL.53.5.1107 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20050304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17551-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70133-3 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0074773 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/aws109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncpneuro0950 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.024 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.65.7.924 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70573-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458511418630 · DOI
- 10.1097/IIO.0b013e318187e801 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458510365156 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01736.x · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260612.51849.ed · DOI
- Oberwahrenbrock T, 2012, Mult Scler Int, 2012, 530305
- 10.1177/1352458513489757 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)00992-0 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.wno.0000223266.48447.1b · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000303817.82134.da · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awl371 · DOI
- 10.1186/1742-2094-11-16 · DOI
- Hofman P, 2001, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 42, 895
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.12.052 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3124 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.060 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.170 · DOI
- 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31823a9ebc · DOI
- 10.2147/OPTH.S43894 · DOI
- Pfueller CF, 2011, Mult Scler Int, 2011, 869814
- 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318254c62d · DOI
- 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318283c3ed · DOI
- Parisi V, 1999, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 40, 2520
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70168-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00415-010-5467-x · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.22005 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awq346 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181af78b8 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345042.53843.d5 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2008.166207 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00417-010-1344-7 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.65.7.920 · DOI
- 10.1167/iovs.08-1815 · DOI
- 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31829c510e · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1832 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0066151 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.066 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513476562 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1167/iovs.11-9324 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awr264 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828c2f7a · DOI
- 10.1111/aos.12215 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0071145 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513503053 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/aws098 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70213-2 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000545 · DOI
- George J, Poster In: 29th Congress of the European Committee for Research and Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS)
- 10.1007/s00415-007-0538-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458508090221 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314832.24682.c6 · DOI
- Li Q, 2001, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 42, 2981
- 10.1001/archopht.119.9.1329 · DOI
- 10.1167/iovs.04-0584 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458512457844 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0018132 · DOI
- 10.1111/ene.12070 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513519838 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458512439439 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2010.188 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5699 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneurol.2011.216 · DOI
- 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1126 · DOI
- 10.1002/jca.21215 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.23573 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701
A neurodegenerative perspective on mitochondrial optic neuropathies
Yu-Wai-Man, P., Votruba, M., Burté, F., La Morgia, C., Barboni, P., & Carelli, V. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1625-2 · Cited by 176
Aquaporin 4-specific T cells and NMO-IgG cause primary retinal damage in experimental NMO/SD
Zeka, B., Hastermann, M., Kaufmann, N., Schanda, K., Pende, M., Misu, T., Rommer, P., Fujihara, K., Nakashima, I., Dahle, C., et al. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0355-y · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, J., de Seze, J., Lana-Peixoto, M., Palace, J., Waldman, A., Schippling, S., Tenembaum, S., Banwell, B., Greenberg, B., Levy, M., Fujihara, K., Chan, K., Kim, H., Asgari, N., Sato, D., Saiz, A., Wuerfel, J., Zimmermann, H., Green, A., Villoslada, P., Paul, F., & GJCF-ICC&BR, W. T.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Neurology Service, University Hospital of Strasbourg, France
- CIEM MS Research Center, University of Minas Gerais Medical School, Belo Horizonte Brazil
- National Health Service (GB)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- Garrahan Hospital (AR)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Tohoku University (JP)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center Goyang Republic of Korea
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Department of Neurology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Paul, F
- ORCID
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 678-688
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- PMC
- PMC4425816
- OpenAlex
- W2055375414
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 12
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation
- National Eye Institute (R01EY022936)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08NS078555, K23NS069806)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- neuromyelitis optica, multiple sclerosis, optical coherence tomography, optic neuritis, retinal nerve fiber layer thinning, ganglion cell layer thinning, microcystic macular edema, aquaporin-4 antibodies, differential diagnosis, retinal damage
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, Optic Neuritis, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Retinal Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review