The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CSF examination still has value in the diagnosis of MS—commentary
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies provide evidence that in adult patients with CIS, CSF OCBs are an independent predictor of the risk of a second attack when controlling for demographic, clinical, treatment, and MRI variables.
“Multiple studies provide evidence that in adult patients with CIS, CSF OCBs are an independent predictor of the risk of a second attack when controlling for demographic, clinical, treatment, and MRI variables. 61-69”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1002/ana.22366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp.57.8.897 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.22466 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182858cbc · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458513485496 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304695 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awv105 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrambide, G., & Tintore, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- ORCID
- Arrambide, Georgina
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-04-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 997-998
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2316955603
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, diagnostic value, diagnostic criteria
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Spinal Puncture, Biomarkers, Post-Dural Puncture Headache
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
