Cited by 77Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesVitamin D Research StudiesPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A systematic review of modifiable risk factors in the progression of multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background The presenting symptoms and rate of progression of multiple sclerosis (MS) are very heterogeneous. The diverse clinical manifestations and the clinical course of the disease may vary with modifiable risk factors. Objective To systematically review modifiable risk factors and exposures associated with MS progression. Methods We searched six databases till March 2015, reference-mined reviews, and consulted with experts (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015016461). Two reviewers screened and extracted data. We used random meta-analysis models and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of evidence. Results In total, 59 studies met inclusion criteria. Lower vitamin D levels were associated with higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores ( r = -0.22; confidence interval (CI) = -0.32, -0.12; 11 studies; I 2 = 66%), smokers had an increased risk of MS progression (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.55; CI = 1.10, 2.19; I 2 = 72%; seven studies), and there was no association of MS progression with the use of epidural analgesics during childbirth delivery (three studies). There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions for 11 risk factors due to conflicting results or use of different predictor and outcome measures. Conclusion MS progression was consistently associated with low vitamin D levels, and smoking was associated with a more rapid decline in MS disability. Studies used a variety of methods, predictors, and outcomes makin…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458517690270

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smoking was the only environmental risk of 84 risks quantified in GBD 2016 that we judged to have sufficient evidence for a causal relationship with multiple sclerosis as an outcome.

    “Smoking was the only environmental risk of 84 risks quantified in GBD 2016 that we judged to have sufficient evidence for a causal relationship with multiple sclerosis as an outcome.24”
  • A second major limitation was the lack of robust predictive covariates for multiple sclerosis to aid in population-based risk assessments, which was due partly to the limited pool of longitudinal neurological disability data that is representative of the multiple sclerosis population.

    “A second major limitation was the lack of robust predictive covariates for multiple sclerosis to aid in population-based risk assessments,24 which was due partly to the limited pool of longitudinal neurological disability data that is representative of the multiple sclerosis population.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 77

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1001/archneur.59.2.301 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1352458510367721 · DOI
  3. Hempel S, 2015, Modifiable risk factors in the progression of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of the epidemiology and treatment
  4. 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224 · DOI
  5. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/2533446 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1186/2046-4053-2-71 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.105320 · DOI
  12. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5993 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1352458508093615 · DOI
  14. Tepavcevic DK, 2010, Eur J Neurol, 17, 487, 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02854.x · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ana.23591 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00415-009-0120-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91533-G · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jns.2012.08.033 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.003 · DOI
  20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1306357 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1159/000345122 · DOI
  22. Jagannath VA, 2010, Cochrane Db Syst Rev, 12, CD008422
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016149 · DOI
  24. Farinotti M, 2012, Cochrane Db Syst Rev, 12, CD004192
  25. Rietberg MB, 2005, Cochrane Db Syst Rev, CD003980
  26. 10.1177/1352458514521309 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1756285611430719 · DOI
  28. 10.1159/000367614 · DOI
  29. Marrie RA, 2013, Continuum, 19, 1046
  30. 10.1007/s11910-012-0293-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hempel, S., Graham, G. D., Fu, N., Estrada, E., Chen, A. Y., Miake-Lye, I., Miles, J. N. V., Shanman, R., Shekelle, P. G., Beroes, J. M., & Wallin, M. T.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hempel, Susanne
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
525-533
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2585967513
Cited by
77
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, disease progression, modifiable risk factors, vitamin D deficiency, smoking, disability progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale
MeSH terms
Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Smoking, Vitamin D, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review