The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment
Abstract
Clinical outcome assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is challenging due to the diversity and fluctuating nature of MS symptoms. Traditional clinical scales such as the EDSS are inadequate in their assessment of key clinical dimensions of MS (e.g., cognitive function), and they have psychometric limitations as well. Based on analyses of pooled data from natural history studies and from placebo groups in clinical trials, the National MS Society's Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force recently proposed a new multidimensional clinical outcome measure, the MS Functional Composite (MSFC). The MSFC comprises quantitative functional measures of three key clinical dimensions of MS: leg function/ambulation, arm/hand function, and cognitive function. Scores on component measures are converted to standard scores (z-scores), which are averaged to form a single MSFC score. Preliminary analyses confirm that: (1) the three clinical dimensions of the MSFC are relatively independent; (2) the MSFC is sensitive to clinical changes over 1- and 2-year intervals; and (3) the MSFC has acceptable criterion validity (i.e., predicts both concurrent and subsequent EDSS change). The advantages and potential limitations of incorporating quantitative functional outcome measures such as the MSFC into collaborative databases are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis
Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70259-x · Cited by 2,088
Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review
McGinley, M. P., Goldschmidt, C. H., & Rae-Grant, A. D. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26858 · Cited by 1,205
Fisniku, L. K., Brex, P. A., Altmann, D. R., Miszkiel, K. A., Benton, C. E., Lanyon, R., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm329 · Cited by 897
Learmonth, Y. C., Motl, R. W., Sandroff, B. M., Pula, J. H., & Cadavid, D. (2013) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/1471-2377-13-37 · Cited by 773
Intermittent Fasting Confers Protection in CNS Autoimmunity by Altering the Gut Microbiota
Cignarella, F., Cantoni, C., Ghezzi, L., Salter, A., Dorsett, Y., Chen, L., Phillips, D., Weinstock, G. M., Fontana, L., Cross, A. H., et al. (2018) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.006 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, J. S., Rudick, R. A., Cutter, G. R., Reingold, S. C., & National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 244-250
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2150378783
- Cited by
- 993
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/135245859900500409
- The paper
- Fischer, J. S., Rudick, R. A., Cutter, G. R., Reingold, S. C., & National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. (1999). The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/135245859900500409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.