The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism
Abstract
The 1990s have seen the emergence of a new `constructivist' approach to international theory and analysis. This article is concerned with the relationship between constructivism and critical international theory, broadly defined. Contrary to the claims of several prominent critical theorists of the Third Debate, we argue that constructivism has its intellectual roots in critical social theory, and that the constructivist project of conceptual elaboration and empirical analysis need not violate the principal epistemological, methodological or normative tenets of critical international theory. Furthermore, we contend that constructivism can make a vital contribution to the development of critical international theory, offering crucial insights into the sociology of moral community in world politics. The advent of constructivism should thus be seen as a positive development, one that not only enables critical theorists to mount a more powerful challenge to the dominant rationalist theories, but one that also promises to advance critical international theory itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
ADLER, E. (1997) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003 · Cited by 1,446
The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate
Wæver, O. (1996) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511660054.009 · Cited by 339
Cited by
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics
Williams, M. C. (2003) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x · Cited by 1,152
Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies
Acharya, A. (2014) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12171 · Cited by 847
Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union
Jupille, J., Caporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414002239370 · Cited by 420
Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison
ZEHFUSS, M. (2001) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066101007003002 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- PRICE, R., & REUS - SMIT, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of International Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-294
- ISSN
- 1354-0661 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3713
- OpenAlex
- W2047060678
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 165.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1354066198004003001
- The paper
- PRICE, R., & REUS - SMIT, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.