The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research
Abstract
This overview aims to stimulate conceptual and practical discussions to help unlock the full potential of realist evaluation in health systems research. Based on a structured literature search, this review maps how the concepts of realist evaluation are applied in health systems research and which methodological problems are encountered. We found a great diversity in the depth of application of the philosophical concepts, use of terminology and scope of application in the research process. Terms of theory-driven evaluation, theories of change and realist evaluation are often used interchangeably. Diverging views exist regarding the nature of ‘mechanism’ and the difference between mechanism and essential context condition. A lack of methodological guidance was highlighted by many authors. Realist evaluation is slowly gaining traction in health systems research, but more clarity is needed concerning the definitions of mechanisms and context and how the configuration of context, mechanism and intervention can be described and assessed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Marchal et al. [18], in a systematic review on realist evaluation in health systems research, also noted that ToC and realist evaluation were often used together or interchangeably.”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Both a published literature review 112 and critical discussions in the applied literature cite several methodological challenges associated with a RE approach, including deciding what constitutes a mechanism, 127 and indeed differentiating between what is a mechanism and what is context.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. Κ. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,318
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Bock, K. E., & Merton, R. Κ. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091967 · Cited by 6,687
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Systems thinking, systems practice
(1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90206-5 · Cited by 3,579
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
Critical realism: essential readings
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5017 · Cited by 1,683
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., Guthrie, B., Lester, H., Wilson, P., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.be · Cited by 1,331
Chen, H.-T. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,227
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Connell JP, 1995, New Approaches To Evaluating Community Initiatives. Concepts, Methods, and Contexts
- Kernick D, 2005, British Journal of Medical Practice, 55, 908
- Pawson R, 1997, Realistic Evaluation
- Weiss C, 1995, New Approaches to Evaluating Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 474
Skalidou, D. (2019) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.28002.58560 · Cited by 15
Exploring the Potential of Theory-Based Evaluation to Strengthen Marine Spatial Planning PracticePreprint
Zuercher, R., Motzer, N., Ban, N. C., Flannery, W., Guerry, A. D., Magris, R. A., Mahajan, S. L., Spalding, A. K., Stelzenmüller, V., & Kramer, J. G. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4297861 · Cited by 13
Zuberbühler, J. P., Pietrantoni, L., Mazzetti, G., Angelis, M. D., Giusino, D., Román-Niaves, M. S., Guglielmi, D., & Salanova, M. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-024-00655-5 · Cited by 20
Oladimeji, O. J., & Fatusi, A. O. (2022) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2022.779130 · Cited by 13
Mathias, K. R., Jain, S., Fraser, R., Davis, M., Kimijima-Dennemeyer, R. M., Pillai, P., Deshpande, S. N., & Wolters, M. K. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001736 · Cited by 16
Hebbar, P. B., Dsouza, V., Nagelhout, G. E., Belle, S. V., Srinivas, P. N., van Schayck, O. C. P., Babu, G. R., & Bhojani, U. M. (2024) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czae081 · Cited by 12
Stakeholder involvement in realist evaluation: A scoping review and best fit framework synthesis
Malengreaux, S., Martens, M., Pleguezuelo, V. C., Ibiloye, O., Belle, S. V., Renmans, D., & Belrhiti, Z. (2024) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890241279562 · Cited by 12
“While RE is still a relatively new approach, it is becoming increasingly relevant in the fields of evaluation, and more specifically in health policy and system research (Marchal et al., 2012; Van Belle, 2022).”
Thijssen, M., Graff, M. J. L., Lexis, M. A. S., der Sanden, M. W. G. N., Radford, K., Logan, P., Daniëls, R., & Kuijer‐Siebelink, W. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054006 · Cited by 12
Goicolea, I., Hurtig, A., Sebastiån, M. S., Marchal, B., & Vives‐Cases, C. (2015) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.08.005 · Cited by 14
Self-citationEvaluating program effects: Conceptualizing and demonstrating a typology
Gao, X., Shen, J., Wu, H., & Krenn, H. Y. (2018) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.008 · Cited by 12
Categories of context in realist evaluation
Sheaff, R., Doran, N., Harris, M., Lang, I., Medina-Lara, A., Fornasiero, M., Ball, S., McGregor-Harper, J., & Bethune, R. M. (2021) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389020968578 · Cited by 12
“The definitional boundary between mechanisms and context is often unclear, even disputed (Astbury and Leeuw, 2010; Marchal et al., 2012; Rog, 2012).”
BackgroundChen, S., & Henry, I. P. (2017) · European Physical Education Review · doi:10.1177/1356336x17721437 · Cited by 12
“The last 15 years have seen a gradual increase in the number of papers applying realist evaluation principles (Marchal et al., 2012), for example in the contexts of policy, practice, and other social evaluation (Gill and Turbin, 1999; Greenhalgh et al.”
BackgroundCapturing the realities of sports programmes: systematic ‘messiness’?
Daniels, J., Bell, B. J., & Horrocks, C. (2018) · International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics · doi:10.1080/19406940.2018.1513414 · Cited by 12
Marchal, B., Abejirinde, I. O., Sulaberidze, L., Chikovani, I., Uchaneishvili, M., Shengelia, N., Diaconu, K., Vassall, A., D, A. Z. M., Giralt, A. N., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047948 · Cited by 13
Self-citationVignettes to Support Theory Refinement: Methodological Insights From a Realist Evaluation
Aldamman, K., Vallières, D. F., & Gilmore, B. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069231216607 · Cited by 11
“Notably, researchers have noted dif fi culties distinguishing between Mechanisms and Contexts Fields (Pedersen, et al., 2012) and uncovering either throughout data collection (Marchal et al., 2012).”
Stokes, T., Atmore, C., Penno, E., Richard, L., Wyeth, E., Richards, R., Doolan‐Noble, F., Gray, A. R., Sullivan, T. A., & Gauld, R. D. C. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030076 · Cited by 11
SEEP-CI: A Structured Economic Evaluation Process for Complex Health System Interventions
Madan, J. J., Kumar, M. B., Taegtmeyer, M., Barasa, E., & Singh, S. P. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186780 · Cited by 11
“These challenges have led to the development of approaches such as realist evaluation, which explicitly considers the mechanisms and context in which an intervention acts [24], and has proven to be valuable for health systems research [25].”
BackgroundBuilding resilience in oncology teams: Protocol for a realist evaluation of multiple cases
Tremblay, D., Touati, N., Kilpatrick, K., Durand, M., Turcotte, A., Prady, C. C. M., Poder, T. G., Richard, P. O., Soldera, S. V., Berbiche, D., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268393 · Cited by 11
“This approach is strategic as it can have a positive influence on the adoption of new practices based on research findings, and can contribute to solving complex problems [72, 114].”
BackgroundO’Neill, K., Riordan, F., Racine, E., Tracey, M., Papoutsi, C., Kearney, P. M., & McHugh, S. (2022) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.5815 · Cited by 11
Goodman, C. M., Gordon, A. L., Martin, F. C., Davies, S. L., Iliffe, S., Bowman, C., Schneider, J. M., Meyer, J. E., Victor, C. R., Gage, H., et al. (2014) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-49 · Cited by 11
“They will provide an account of the behaviour and perceived interrelationships of the processes that are responsible for achieving change [33] and operational definitions to inform how they may be recognised and tracked within different models of service delivery to care homes.”
BackgroundThe Troubled Families Programme: Learning about policy impact through realist case study research
Parr, S., & Churchill, H. (2019) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12529 · Cited by 16
The use of realist approaches for health research in Indigenous communities
Bergeron, D. A., Tremblay, M., Dogba, M. J., Martin, D. H., & McGavock, J. (2021) · AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/1177180121996063 · Cited by 11
“…may be difficult to operationalize (Robert & Ridde, 2013) given that there are some difficulties in conceptualizing and differentiating some concepts used in RAs such as elements of context and mechanisms (Astbury & Leeuw, 2010; Marchal et al., 2012; Robert & Ridde, 2013; Salter & Kothari, 2014).”
BackgroundBrown, J. A., Lewans, M., Menon, D., & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103677 · Cited by 11
Quintans, J. R., Yonekura, T., Trapé, C. A., & Soares, C. B. (2020) · Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1518-8345.3933.3255 · Cited by 10
“The authors recommend greater clarity regarding the definitions of mechanisms and context, two elements considered structural in the realist evaluation, in addition to the outcome(8).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMalcolm, C. A., & Knighting, K. (2022) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-022-00921-8 · Cited by 10
Wells, R., Acartürk, C., Mozumder, M. K., Kurt, G., Klein, L. A., Lekkeh, S. A., Beetar, A., Jahan, S., Almeamari, F., Faruk, M. O., et al. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05246-1 · Cited by 10
“Combining routine qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis, the RE framework examines processes and mechanisms underpinning the intervention [15, 16].”
BackgroundMethodIdentifying the factors that influence teacher practice change in a single case study
Forrest, R. H.-J., Lowe, R., Potts, M. A., & Poyser, C. (2019) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2019.1623761 · Cited by 10
“As Marchal et al. (2012) state, “defining ‘context’ and separating ‘mechanism’ from ‘context’ remains a difficult issue” (p. 207).”
Law, R., Langley, J., Hall, B., Burton, C. R., Hiscock, J., Williams, L., Morrison, V., LEMMEY, A. B., Lovell-Smith, C., Gallanders, J., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046751 · Cited by 9
Goh, K., Contractor, S. Q., & Belle, S. V. (2022) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-022-00678-8 · Cited by 17
Dziruni, T. B., Hutchinson, A. M., Coomer, J., Keppich‐Arnold, S., & Bucknall, T. K. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.13347 · Cited by 10
Ryan, B., Jones, M., Anderson, P., Reynolds, R., Nicholls, R., Cullen, K., Davies, M. W., North, R. V., Molik, B., & Wallace, C. A. (2024) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.13397 · Cited by 9
“27 Cycle 2 further dimensionalised the embryonic Initial Programme Theory—iteratively confirming, refuting and refining the elements through a systematic review of the literature.”
Rillotta, F., Lindsay, L., & Gibson-Pope, C. (2021) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2021.1937343 · Cited by 9
“This study also explored whether the UTHP placement can be functional in other contexts (Marchal et al. 2012; Pawson and Tilley 1997).”
Backgroundvan Iperen, L. P., JONGE, J. D., Gevers, J., Vos, S. B., & Hespanhol, L. (2022) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2021.2015479 · Cited by 10
“In addition, mixed methods and “realist approaches” may allow one to detect patterns otherwise missed out on, particularly in combination with more systematically gathered qualitative information (see Marchal et al., 2012; Ryba et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBelle, S. V., Abejirinde, I. O., Ssennyonjo, A., Srinivas, P. N., Hebbar, P. B., & Marchal, B. (2023) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890231185167 · Cited by 9
“It may help to involve social scientists who are knowledgeable about a broad range of social phenomena, paradigms and theories, and to embed the evaluation in a broader cycle of theory construction (Greenhalgh and Emmel, 2018; Jones, 2018; Marchal et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBosongo, S., Belrhiti, Z., Chenge, F. M., Criel, B., Coppieters, Y., & Marchal, B. (2024) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-024-01115-9 · Cited by 11
“In practice, RE begins and ends with a theory [27, 28].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHjort (2021) · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042728 · Cited by 11
Sundberg, L. R., Christianson, M., Wiklund, M., Hurtig, A., & Goicolea, I. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048922 · Cited by 12
Palm, R., Fahsold, A., Roes, M., & Holle, B. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259496 · Cited by 9
“Developed in the 1990s by Pawson & Tilly in the UK [19], the realist methodology is gaining increasing attention in nursing research [20] and other health care research fields [21].”
BackgroundHow to research the mechanisms of non-pharmacological cardiac interventions
Clark, A. M., Thirsk, L. M., Wiens, K. S., Ski, C. F., & Thompson, D. R. (2015) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.114 · Cited by 9
Haque, H. M. J., Hill, P. C., & Gauld, R. D. C. (2017) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-017-0029-8 · Cited by 9
“[31], realist evaluation has been increasingly applied in a variety of fields within health systems research.”
BackgroundLeuthold, M. S., Schwarz, J., Marti, J., Perraudin, C., Hudon, C., Peytremann‐Bridevaux, I., Senn, N., & Cohidon, C. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040154 · Cited by 9
Pomey, M., de Guise, M., Desforges, M., Bouchard, K., Vialaron, C., Normandin, L., Nelea, M. I., Fortin, I., Ganache, I., Régis, C., et al. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06065-4 · Cited by 9
Floate, H. J., Durham, J., & Marks, G. C. (2018) · Journal of Development Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19439342.2018.1551921 · Cited by 10
“CMO configurations are identified in the analysis phase of the realist evaluation cycle and are translated through a synthesis of evidence into a middle-range theory, which is then tested and retested iteratively until an end theory is reached (Marchal et al. 2012).”
BackgroundScheffelaar, A., Bos, N., Triemstra, M., de Jong, M., Luijkx, K. G., & van Dulmen, S. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033034 · Cited by 8
Unpacking Mechanisms in Climate Resilient Agriculture Interventions
Barrett, S., D’Errico, S., Anderson, S., & Nebsu, B. (2020) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.20423 · Cited by 8
“When realist evaluation is applied empirically, it is typically within the field of health systems (Marchal et al., 2012).”
MethodA Realist Synthesis of Community-Based Interventions in Vector-Borne Diseases
Pérez, D., Robert, É., Pérez, E. J., Vanlerberghe, V., Lefèvre, P., & Ridde, V. (2021) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0944 · Cited by 8
“difficulties differentiating them from activities and specific intervention resources has also been reported in the literature.(14,72,73) However, investigators do not necessarily need an understanding of mechanisms to conduct research”
BackgroundOfficer, T. N., Cumming, J., & McBride‐Henry, K. (2021) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00587-y · Cited by 12
Bonney, A. D., Metusela, C., Mullan, J., Barnett, S., Rhee, J., Kobel, C., & Batterham, M. J. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05438-8 · Cited by 8
Realist evaluation of health promotion interventions: a scoping review
Malengreaux, S., Doumont, D., Scheen, B., Durme, T. V., & Aujoulat, I. (2022) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daac136 · Cited by 8
A community pharmacy practice-based research network: A protocol for a realist evaluation
Handyside, L., Cameron, J., & Freeman, C. R. (2022) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.12.002 · Cited by 8
Craig, S. G., Mitchell, G., O’Halloran, P. D., Stark, P., & Wilson, C. B. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04090-y · Cited by 7
“This is a theory-driven methodology that supports researchers in evaluating social programmes, such as DFCs [19].”
MethodDziruni, T. B., Hutchinson, A. M., Keppich‐Arnold, S., & Bucknall, T. K. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077597 · Cited by 8
“28 29 The methodology is based on the philosophical paradigm of realism, which positions itself between the positivist and the constructivist paradigms and emphasises the search for alignment between reality and our constructions of reality.”
MethodMarchal, B., Giralt, A. N., Sulaberidze, L., Chikovani, I., & Abejirinde, I. O. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030257 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLaw, R., Langley, J., Hall, B., Burton, C. R., Hiscock, J., Williams, L., Morrison, V., LEMMEY, A. B., Lovell-Smith, C., Gallanders, J., et al. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09160 · Cited by 8
Belle, S. V. (2022) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-022-01644-1 · Cited by 7
A personal reflection on co-creation in public health: a dream partly realised
Bauman, A. E. (2022) · Public Health Research & Practice · doi:10.17061/phrp3222210 · Cited by 7
Standing back and looking forward: Editors’ reflections on the 20th Anniversary of Evaluation
Stern, E., Saunders, M., & Stame, N. (2015) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389015608757 · Cited by 7
Clark, J. D., & Wright, V. (2018) · The urban book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72311-2_3 · Cited by 7
Cash‐Gibson, L., Martínez‐Herrera, E., & Benach, J. (2021) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101986 · Cited by 7
What can realist evaluation tell us about how coaching interventions work?
Kovács, L. C., & Corrie, S. (2016) · The Coaching Psychologist · doi:10.53841/bpstcp.2016.12.2.59 · Cited by 7
Decat, P. (2015) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.3150.3843 · Cited by 7
Simmons, T., Brinkley, A., Quarmby, T., Horner, L., Sherar, L. B., Hooper, O., & Kinnafick, F. (2024) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2024.2303773 · Cited by 6
“Moreover, a realist approach can develop potential explanations for what has been found within the literature and create theories – known as transferable theories (see Merton, 1967) – which can be transferred to inform programme implementation in di ff ering environments (Marchal et al., 2012).”
Westergren, A., Ahlström, G., Persson, M., & Behm, L. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244600 · Cited by 5
Realist evaluation and its role in the stages of explanatory research based on critical realism
Parra, J. D. (2023) · Journal of Critical Realism · doi:10.1080/14767430.2023.2251816 · Cited by 6
“Taking into account previous cautions expressed by RE practitioners (Greenhalgh et al. 2015; Marchal et al. 2012), I acknowledge the validity of critics ’ concerns that applied RE might have yielded to the temptation of excessively focusing on the analysis of ‘ actual measurable events and…”
Dziruni, T. B., Hutchinson, A. M., Keppich‐Arnold, S., & Bucknall, T. K. (2024) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2024.1400060 · Cited by 6
Confidentiality, anonymity and amnesty for midwives in distress seeking online support – Ethical?
Pezaro, S., Clyne, W., & Gerada, C. (2016) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733016654315 · Cited by 10
Avaliação de programas, estratégias e ações de saúde: um diálogo com o realismo crítico
Costa, D. M., & Magalhães, R. (2019) · Saúde em Debate · doi:10.1590/0103-11042019s715 · Cited by 6
Fletcher-Hildebrand, S., Alimezelli, H. T., Carr, T., Lawson, K. L., Ali, A., & Groot, G. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044522 · Cited by 8
“72 For example, the iterative nature of realist evaluations may inhibit forward movement in the evaluation.”
BackgroundRicour, M., Bosscher, V. D., & Shibli, S. (2023) · International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics · doi:10.1080/19406940.2022.2161595 · Cited by 6
“…of organised youth sport and decide whether and how to stimulate demand in their affiliated sport clubs through (a) making their services more available to attract new youth members and/or (b) improving the quality of their supply for existing youth members (Bullough 2011, Meldrum & McDonald 1995).”
BackgroundWheat, H. C., Weston, L., Oh, T. M., Morgan‐Trimmer, S., Ingram, W. M., Griffiths, S., Sheaff, R., Clarkson, P., Medina‐Lara, A., Musicha, C., et al. (2023) · BJGP Open · doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0019 · Cited by 9
Hari Sankar, D., Benny, G., Jaya, S., & Nambiar, D. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18181-x · Cited by 6
“Realist approaches have been used to look at complex health systems phenomena and qualitative research [24, 25], as well as community action for health in particular [26–28], and were considered uniquely appropriate for our analysis.”
MethodCaswell, R. J., Maidment, I., Ross, J. D. C., & Bradbury‐Jones, C. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037599 · Cited by 7
Hill, Z. E., Scheelbeek, P., Hamza, Y. A., Amare, Y., & Schellenberg, J. (2020) · Global Health Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00410 · Cited by 6
Cunningham, U., De Brún, A., Willgerodt, M., Abu-Rish Blakeney, E., & McAuliffe, E. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18168604 · Cited by 5
Srinivas, P. N., Marchal, B., Macq, J., Kegels, G., & Criel, B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2451132 · Cited by 6
Self-citationHazen, A. C. M., Sloeserwij, V., GROOT, E. D., de Gier, J. J., de Wit, N. J., Bont, A. A. D., & Zwart, D. L. M. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10703-y · Cited by 5
“…external to the intervention, present or occurring even if the intervention does not lead to an outcome, and which may have influence on the outcome” [23] and mechanism-elements as underlying processes or structures, usually hidden, which operate in particular contexts and generate outcomes [24].”
BackgroundPenno, E., Atmore, C., Maclennan, B., Richard, L., Wyeth, E., Richards, R., Doolan‐Noble, F., Gray, A. R., Sullivan, T. A., Gauld, R. D. C., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079268 · Cited by 5
“Using a realist-informed evaluation, we sought to understand how NZ’s four regional DHB groupings worked to improve health system integration, health outcomes and equity for their respective regional populations.”
BackgroundGuiding Through Turbulent Times: Coaching During Merger and Acquisition
Schmitt, J., Vasquez, C., & Pauknerová, D. (2024) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697017.2024.2361415 · Cited by 5
“The outcomes (O) explored focus on the effects on the employees’ mental health, more specifically, how the interventions changed how people work, think and behave to better cope with the challenges they are facing (Marchal et al., 2012).”
Using Realistic Evaluation to understand how interventions work on dairy farms
Koralesky, K. E., Mills, K. E., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2021) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100233 · Cited by 5
Mosedale, A., Hendrie, D. V., Geelhoed, E. A., Zurynski, Y. A., & Robinson, S. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045172 · Cited by 5
Blewitt, C., Bajayo, R., Cameron, L., Sun, Y., Morris, H., & Skouteris, H. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/18369391221146630 · Cited by 5
“However, researchers report difficulty applying the methodology in practice (Dalkin et al., 2015; Marchal et al., 2012).”
BackgroundHow benchmarking motivates colostrum management practices on dairy farms: A realistic evaluation
Wilson, D. J., Roche, S. M., Pempek, J. A., Habing, G. G., Proudfoot, K. L., & Renaud, D. L. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-23383 · Cited by 5
Vesinurm, M., Halminen, O., Linna, M., Mikkola, H., & Lillrank, P. M. (2023) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.12938 · Cited by 5
Haruta, J., Takayashiki, A., Ozone, S., Maeno, T., & Maeno, T. (2022) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2072282 · Cited by 5
“The realist approach has been offered in several theory-based evaluations developed within the social sciences (Pawson et al. 1997; Marchal et al. 2012; Wong et al. 2016).”
BackgroundCleal, B. R., Willaing, I., Høybye, M. T., & Thomsen, H. H. (2020) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/18146 · Cited by 5
“Theory-driven evaluation represents an ideal approach to the appraisal of complex real-world interventions [30].”
BackgroundVugts, M. A. P., Liu, H., Boumans, J., & Boydell, E. (2018) · International Journal of Care Coordination · doi:10.1177/2053434518779751 · Cited by 5
“using “normal” RCT methods for the aims of RE) may be an oxymoron because realistic conceptions on generative causation and complexity contradict the assumption that control groups are necessary in experimentation, that random allocation results in equal group conditions in all relevant aspects, and that quantitative…”
BackgroundAn integrated realist evaluation model to evaluate organisational interventions
Roodbari, H., Nielsen, K. M., & Axtell, C. M. (2021) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2021.10830abstract · Cited by 5
Champions as catalysts for change: a realist evaluation of their impact in primary care
Martin, É., Bergeron, D. A., & Gaboury, I. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13573-0 · Cited by 4
“Emerging themes were organized in the form of Context, Mechanism, or Outcome, and then regrouped as CMO configurations for each case [60–62].”
Conversations in Evaluation – Exploring 30 years of debates in our field
Delahais, T., & Thyrard, A. (2025) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890251406246 · Cited by 4
“This is the reason why this group of articles is also much more connected to other evaluation journals, especially AJE and NDE , and also, although this is not visible from our data, with public health (see, for example, Marchal et al., 2012).”
Aivalli, P., Hebbar, P. B., Mbachu, C. O., Srinivas, P. N., Abímbọ́lá, Ṣ., & Dada, S. (2025) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czaf080 · Cited by 5
“…applied to explore intersectoral collaboration, community engagement, and health policy implementation in a range of contexts and settings (Marchal et al. 2012, Jagosh et al. 2015, Bergeron et al. 2017, Adhikari et al. 2019, Irvine Fitzpatrick et al. 2021, Mbachu et al. 2022, Hogeling et…”
Influentialvan Hees, S., Carlier, B. E., Joosen, M. C. W., Blonk, R. W. B., & Oomens, S. P. C. J. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.16993/sjwop.249 · Cited by 4
Lukersmith, S., Woods, C., Salvador‐Carulla, L., Niyonsenga, T., Mohanty, I., Gutiérrez-Colosía, M. R., Díaz-Milanés, D., GARCÍA-ALONSO, C. R., & Büsst, C. J. (2025) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152599 · Cited by 4
Bosongo, S., Belrhiti, Z., Chenge, F., Criel, B., & Marchal, B. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073508 · Cited by 4
Self-citationOn Smart Cities and Triple-Helix Intermediaries: A Critical-Realist Perspective
Chatzinikolaou, D. (2025) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities8030074 · Cited by 9
“Although a few publications implement literature review approaches based on the lens of critical realism (cf. [64]), it remains uncommon to see research explicitly embracing and applying this philosophical stance in smart-city scholarship (e.g., [65,66]) or research policy (e.g., [67]).”
Charlier, N., Colman, E., Irusta, L. A., Anthierens, S., Durme, T. V., Macq, J., & Pétré, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.958168 · Cited by 4
“The theory of change “describes how a program brings about specific long-term outcomes through a logical sequence of intermediate outcomes (and actions)” (32), and it is embedded in the realist evaluation paradigm (33) adopted by FAITH.”
BackgroundChidama, Y. E., & Ononiwu, C. (2022) · The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries · doi:10.1002/isd2.12256 · Cited by 6
Bysted, S., Overgaard, C., Simpson, S. A., Curtis, T., & Bøggild, H. (2021) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13246 · Cited by 4
Standardised Data on Initiatives – STARDIT: Beta VersionPreprint
Nunn, J., Shafee, T. M. A., Chang, S., Stephens, R., Elliot, J., Oliver, S. R., John, D., Smith, M. P., Orr, N., Preston, J., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-934285/v1 · Cited by 4
Implementation of large-system transformation initiatives in the New Zealand health system
Sharma, K. (2021) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.15130413.v1 · Cited by 4
de Jong, M. A. J. G., Wink, G., Koelen, M. A., & Wagemakers, A. (2023) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-023-01027-0 · Cited by 3
“Step 1 Transcripts of the evaluation sessions (Sources I–III, Table 1) were coded in terms of context conditions (C), underlying mechanisms (M) in the actual programme, and outcomes observed by respondents (O) [58].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Marchal, B., van Belle, S., van Olmen, J., Hoerée, T., & Kegels, G.
- Affiliations
- ITM-A, Belgium
- BTC, Belgium
- Venue
- Evaluation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-212
- ISSN
- 1356-3890 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7153
- OpenAlex
- W2077589521
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 30.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- realist evaluation, health systems research, mechanisms, context, intervention, theory of change, theory-based evaluation, methodological recommendations, conceptual clarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review