Cited by 53Ophthalmology and Visual Health ResearchRetinal Imaging and AnalysisTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Tele-ophthalmology: Opportunities for improving diabetes eye care in resource- and specialist-limited Sub-Saharan African countries

Matimba, Alice, Woodward, Richmond, Tambo, Ernest, Ramsay, Michele, Gwanzura, Lovemore, Guramatunhu, Solomon·2016·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Tele-ophthalmology using portable retinal imaging technology, mobile phone and Internet connectivity offers a solution to improve access to diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening services in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries where the burden of diabetes is increasing and there is limited access to eye care services and specialists. The Zimbabwe Retinopathy Telemedicine Project (ZRTP) established routine DR screening at a hospital-based diabetic clinic in the urban capital city, Harare. A handheld ‘point and shoot’ digital camera operated by a trained nurse was used to acquire retina images of 203 diabetic patients. A secured ‘store-and forward’ approach was set up and used for sharing and transfer of images to a retinal specialist at a remote site for reading. This method enabled detection of non-macular DR (11%), diabetic macular oedema (5%), cataract (5%) and glaucoma (6%) among the patients screened. ZRTP demonstrated the utility of tele-ophthalmology for routine retinal screening for diabetic patients in Zimbabwe who have limited access to eye care services. In addition, ZRTP showed how tele-ophthalmology services can provide an empirical framework for providing patient education, and a platform for research in the detection of DR. This approach could be used as a model to address the DR challenges in other countries in SSA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x15604083

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remote grading of retinal images was widely utilized, with 18 out of 30 studies relying on this approach.

    “Remote grading of retinal images is widely utilized, with 18 out of 30 studies relying on this approach [10, 15, 16, 18, 21–27, 29–35, 37]”
  • The International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy severity scale was the most commonly utilized severity scale, used in 15 out of 30 studies.

    “Various severity scales are used to classify diabetic retinopathy (DR), with the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) severity scale being the most commonly utilized in 15 out of 30 studies [9, 11–13, 15, 18, 21–23, 32, 34–36].”
  • Image acquisition was often performed by trained non-physician staff, while final grading was typically carried out by ophthalmologists or retinal specialists in 22 out of 30 studies.

    “Image acquisition was often performed by trained non-physician staff (technicians, optometrists, nurses, paramedics), while final grading was typically carried out by ophthalmologists or retinal specialists (22/30 studies) [8–13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 30–37]”
  • Mydriasis was employed in 17 out of 30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate.

    “Mydriasis was employed in 17/30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate [9, 12, 18, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35, 36].”
  • The predominant method for managing remotely graded images was store and forward (14 out of 30 studies), with seven studies adopting real-time processing.

    “The predominant method for managing these remotely graded images is ‘store and forward’ (14 out of 30 studies) [15, 16, 18, 22–24, 26–30, 33, 35, 37], with seven studies adopting the ‘real-time’ processing method [8, 10, 11, 25, 31, 32, 34]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matimba, A., Woodward, R., Tambo, E., Ramsay, M., Gwanzura, L., & Guramatunhu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
  • Greenwood Park Eye Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe
Corresponding author
Matimba, Alice
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2015-09-24
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
311-316
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2334098582
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Beit Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
teleophthalmology, diabetic retinopathy screening, store-and-forward telemedicine, access to eye care, diabetic macular edema, cataract, glaucoma, patient education, sub-Saharan Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetic Retinopathy, Eye Diseases, Female, Glaucoma, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Ophthalmology, Patient Education as Topic, Photography, Zimbabwe, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review