CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsVascular anomalies and interventionsPeripheral Artery Disease Management

Use of computed tomographic and digital subtraction angiography to determine optimal duplex ultrasound criteria for predicting superior mesenteric artery in-stent restenosis

Open access
Pamulapati, Vivek, Guitart, Joan R, Helenowski, Irene B, Resnick, Scott, Ho, Karen J·2021·Vascular Medicine
DOI 10.1177/1358863x211025615PMC PMC8845051
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Keywords duplex ultrasound, in-stent restenosis, mesenteric artery stent, vascular imaging/diagnostics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1358863x211025615

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various small studies have assessed DUS for the detection of ≥70% SMA in stent re-stenosis (ISR) and found optimal PSV cutoff values between 300 cm/s and 400 cm/s.

    “Various small studies have assessed DUS for the detection of 70% SMA in stent re-stenosis (ISR) and found optimal PSV cutoff values between 300cm/s and 400 cm/s.”

    From Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Diseases of the Mesenteric and Renal Arteries and Veins. (2025) · cites this paper as [92]

    The introduction describes prior studies with modest sample sizes that assessed DUS criteria for SMA in-stent restenosis. The results and discussion do not give those studies’ optimal PSV cutoffs as 300–400 cm/s; this paper reports its own cutoff of 457 cm/s. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2]Mitchell EL, Chang EY, Landry GJ, Liem TK, Keller FS, Moneta GL. Duplex criteria for native superior mesenteric artery stenosis overestimate stenosis in stented superior mesenteric arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(2): 335– 340. 19233596
  2. [3]Aburahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA, Hass SM, Dean LS, Keiffer T. Duplex velocity criteria for native celiac/superior mesenteric artery stenosis vs in-stent stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55(3): 730– 738. 22301212
  3. [5]Barnes JA, Columbo JA, Ponukumati AS, Long-Term Outcomes of Mesenteric Stenting and Analysis of In-Stent Restenosis Duplex Velocity Criteria. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 68: 226– 233. 32428638
  4. [6]Green J, Ryer E, Borden N, Defining Duplex Ultrasound Criteria for In-Stent Restenosis of the Superior Mesenteric Artery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021; Jan 27; S0890–5096(21)00077–7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.023. 33508454 · DOI
  5. [7]Lopera JE, Trimmer CK, Lamba R, MDCT angiography of mesenteric bypass surgery for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(5): 1439– 1445. 19843765
  6. [8]Huber TS, Björck M, Chandra A, Chronic mesenteric ischemia: Clinical practice guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 73(1): 87S– 115S. 33171195

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pamulapati, V., Guitart, J. R., Helenowski, I. B., Resnick, S., & Ho, K. J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Ho, Karen J
ORCID
Venue
Vascular Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2021-07-16
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
566-568
ISSN
  • 1358-863X (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0377
DOI
10.1177/1358863x211025615
PMC
PMC8845051
OpenAlex
W3181915585
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Vascular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL094293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Keywords
superior mesenteric artery, in-stent restenosis, duplex ultrasound, CT angiography, digital subtraction angiography, restenosis prediction
MeSH terms
Humans, Recurrence, Stents, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Coronary Restenosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review