Cited by 72Health and Wellbeing ResearchHealth, psychology, and well-beingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Canonical Correlation Reveals Important Relations between Health Locus of Control, Coping, Affect and Values

Masters, Kevin S., Wallston, Kenneth A.·2005·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

This article explored advantages of canonical correlation using the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales in relation to measures of coping, affect and values. Survey data collected from 659 participants demonstrated significant canonical correlations between the MHLC and synthetic variables representing all three of these constructs. Results verified some previously hypothesized relations (e.g. external health control relates to passive coping) and introduced new findings pertaining to the relations between networks of MHLC variables and networks of the other three constructs (e.g. positive affect relates to collaborative control between self and God regarding health). Canonical correlation promotes greater understanding of relations between health loci of control and other multidimensional variables than can be obtained through simpler analytic strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105305055332

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many individuals who believe God is in control of health also believe that God has charged them with responsibility to engage in certain behaviors, some health related.

    “because many of those who believe God is in control also believe that God has charged them with the responsibility to engage in certain behaviors, some health related.”
  • Some aspects of RS are related to cardiovascular reactivity, levels of cardiac autonomic control, and immune functioning.

    “Some aspects of RS are related to cardiovascular reactivity (Masters et al., 2005), levels of cardiac autonomic control (Berntson et al., 2008), and immune functioning (Ai et al., 2010).”
  • Individuals who believe that God is ultimately in control of their health do not necessarily display an external locus of health control and passive coping strategies; this is often not the case.

    “it may be presumed that individuals who believe that God is ultimately in control of their health display an external locus of health control and are characterized by passive coping strategies. This is often not the case (e.g., Masters & Wallston, 2005; Umezawa et al., 2012)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masters, K. S., & Wallston, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Masters, Kevin S.
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2005-09
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
719-731
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W1977056581
Cited by
72
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
health locus of control, Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, coping, affect, values, positive affect, passive coping, collaborative control, self and God, canonical correlation analysis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Female, Health Status, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Social Values, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review