Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety

Open access
Martyn, Patricia, Brymer, Eric·2016·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between anxiety and feelings of being connected to nature. Two standardised self-report scales, the Nature Relatedness Scale and the State Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety, were used in tandem with a qualitative question. Quantitative results indicated that connection to nature was significantly related to lower levels of overall, state cognitive and trait cognitive anxiety. Qualitative results revealed seven themes: relaxation, time out, enjoyment, connection, expanse, sensory engagement and a healthy perspective. Taken together, these results suggest that opportunities that enhance experiences of being connected to nature may reduce unhelpful anxiety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105314555169

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1300/J067v22n01_07 · doi:10.1300/j067v22n01_07
  2. Bowler D, Buyung-Ali L, Knight T, (2010) The importance of nature for health: Is there a specific benefit of contact with green space? CEE review 08-003 (SR40). Environmental Evidence. Available at: www.environmental-evidence.org/SR40.html
  3. Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment, 2004, Nature and Health. The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being
  4. Heerwagen JH, 1993, The Biophilia Hypothesis, 138
  5. Kaplan R, 1989, The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective
  6. Röderer K, 2012, Vulnerability, Risks, and Complexity: Impacts of Global Change on Human Habitats, 3, 243
  7. Ulrich RS, 1993, The Biophilia Hypothesis, 73
  8. Van den Berg AE (2005) Health Impacts of Healing Environments: A Review of Evidence for Benefits of Nature, Daylight, Fresh Air, and Quiet in Healthcare Settings. Available at: http://www.agnesvandenberg.nl/healingenvironments.pdf
  9. 10.1089/eco.2010.0054 · doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0054
  10. Zeller J (2006) An exploration of the psychologically restorative qualities of the natural world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston, MA: Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Martyn, P., & Brymer, E.
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
1436-1445
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W2149416336
Cited by
264
References
34
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1359105314555169
The paper
Martyn, P., & Brymer, E. (2016). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314555169

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.