The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology.
Abstract
Over the past 25 years, numerous calls for increased meth-odological diversity and alternative research methods have been made (Gelso, 1979; Goldman, 1976; Howard, 1983). These calls have led to important discussions about incorpo-rating qualitative methods in counseling research and includ-ing qualitative studies in traditional publication outlets (Hosh-mand, 1989; Maione & Chenail, 1999; Morrow & Smith, 2000). They have also led to discussions about integrating quantita-tive and qualitative methods, commonly referred to as mixed methods research. In the social sciences at large, mixed methods research has become increasingly popular and may be considered a le-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“Each could, for example, “uncover some unique variance which otherwise may have been neglected by a single method” (Jick, 1979, p. 603).”
BackgroundSAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000097254001 · Cited by 2,884
Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x · Cited by 151
Orndorff, R. M., & Herr, E. L. (1996) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02303.x · Cited by 92
Cited by
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05282260 · Cited by 3,167
Self-citationMeta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention
Poston, J. M., & Hanson, W. E. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0018679 · Cited by 276
Self-citationMixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
Midgley, N., Ansaldo, F., & Target, M. (2014) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/a0034179 · Cited by 128
RESPONSE TO ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: THE EFFECTS OF GRADES, PRAISE, AND SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02116.x · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-235
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2159096955
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 119.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
- The paper
- Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
