The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The perfect subject (postcolonial object studies)
Abstract
This article argues that the late 20th-century tradition of material culture studies, as well as its more recent object-oriented offspring, emerged as a response to the 1980s crisis of representation and the deeper postcolonial critiques that accompanied this crisis. As it became more and more difficult to study and make claims about non-Western people, anthropologists and scholars in related disciplines began to explore the advantages of treating non-human objects as quasi-human subjects. Things proved safer to study than people and the popularity of ‘thing theory’ grew, at least in part, for this very reason. More importantly, the analytical shift of focus from people to things had the effect of salvaging – and, indeed, greatly amplifying – the representational authority of Western scholars at the precise moment when that authority seemed to be evaporating.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ontological claim of mute things is a result of epistemic violence, not constitutive of the thing itself.
“It is important to clarify that the ontological claim of mute things is actually a result of epistemic violence, not something constitutive of the thing itself (Olsen 2010; for a critique see Fowles 2016).”
From Archaeological Encounters: The Role of the Speculative in Decolonial Archaeology (2019) · cites this paper as Fowles 2016
Citations
Cites
Introduction: commodities and the politics of value
Appadurai, A. (1986) · The Social Life of Things · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582.003 · Cited by 4,001 · cited 3×
“…most influential statements of anthropology’s crisis of representation and its experimental search for new representational strategies (Clifford and Marcus, 1986; Marcus and Fischer, 1986) but it also saw the publication of the first major call for a new ‘anthropology of things’ (Appadurai, 1986).”
BackgroundArt And Agency: An Anthropological Theory
Gell, A. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001 · Cited by 3,460
Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture
Ingold, T. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203559055 · Cited by 2,085
What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001 · Cited by 1,508
Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things
Hodder, I. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781118241912 · Cited by 1,488
Miller, D. (2005) · Materiality · doi:10.1215/9780822386711-001 · Cited by 521
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1086/662027 · DOI
- 10.2307/1354221 · DOI
- Barthes R, 1972, Mythologies
- Baudrillard J, 2005, The System of Objects
- 10.1215/9780822391623 · DOI
- 10.1111/amet.12083 · DOI
- 10.1086/200061 · DOI
- Brown B, 2004, Things
- 10.1086/500700 · DOI
- Callon M, 1986, Power, Action and Belief
- 10.2307/2928386 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520946286-003 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520946286 · DOI
- Comaroff J, 1992, Ethnography and the Historical Imagination, 3
- Deloria V, 1988, Custer Died for Your Sins
- Domanska E, 2006, Archaeologia Polona, 44, 171
- 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01153.x · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226259031.001.0001 · DOI
- Ginsburg F, 1989, Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community
- Harman G, 2005, Guerrilla Metaphysics
- 10.4324/9780203088791 · DOI
- Hieb L, 2006, Canyon Gardens: The Ancient Pueblo Landscapes of the American Southwest, 113
- 10.3366/E1471576707000034 · DOI
- Holbraad M, 2010, Critique of Anthropology, 30, 179
- 10.1017/S1380203807002127 · DOI
- Kiaer C, 2005, Imagine No Possessions: The Social Objects of Russian Constructivism
- 10.9783/9780812202496 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511819582.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Latour B, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
- 10.2307/800624 · DOI · Paper page
- Latour B, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern
- Latour B, 1999, Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies
- 10.4159/9780674039964 · DOI
- Latour B, 1979, Laboratory Life
- Leach E, 1973, The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, 761
- Marcus G, 1992, Lives in Trust: The Fortunes of Dynastic Families in Late Twentieth Century America
- Marcus G, 1986, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences
- Miller D, 1987, Material Culture and Mass Consumption
- Miller D, 1994, Modernity, an Ethnographic Approach
- Miller D, 1998, A Theory of Shopping
- 10.1086/421127 · DOI
- Nader L, 1972, Reinventing Anthropology, 284
- 10.1080/00293650310000650 · DOI · Paper page
- Olsen B, 2010, In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects
- 10.1525/california/9780520274167.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1086/RESv9n1ms20166719 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822386711-011 · DOI
- 10.1353/crt.2006.0006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01158.x · DOI
- Rathje W, 1992, Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage
- Sahlins M, 2002, Waiting for Foucault, Still, 73
- Said E, 1978, Orientalism
- 10.1086/448481 · DOI
- Spyer P, 1998, Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Places
- 10.4159/9780674044326 · DOI
- Whitehead H, 1987, Renunciation and Reformulation: A Study of Conversion in an American Sect
- Whiteley P, 1993, Journal of the Southwest, 35, 125
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeological Encounters: The Role of the Speculative in Decolonial Archaeology
Rizvi, U. (2019) · Journal of Contemporary Archaeology · doi:10.1558/jca.33866 · Cited by 22
A Relational Marxist Critique of Posthumanism in Archaeology
McGuire, R. H. (2021) · Cambridge Archaeological Journal · doi:10.1017/s0959774321000184 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowles, S.
- Affiliations
- Barnard College, Columbia University, NY, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Material Culture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-27
- ISSN
- 1359-1835
- 1460-3586
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review