Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Relation between Baseline HIV Drug Resistance and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy: Re-Analysis of Retrospective and Prospective Studies Using a Standardized Data Analysis Plan

Open access
DeGruttola, Victor, Dix, Lynn, D'Aquila, Richard, Holder, Dan, Phillips, Andrew, Ait-Khaled, Mounir, Baxter, John, Clevenbergh, Philippe, Hammer, Scott, Harrigan, Richard, Katzenstein, David, Lanier, Randall, Miller, Michael, Para, Michael, Yerly, Sabine, Zolopa, Andrew, Murray, Jeffrey, Patick, Amy, Miller, Veronica, Castillo, Steven, Pedneault, Louise, Mellors, John·2000·Antiviral Therapy

Abstract

To assess the relation between resistance to antiretroviral drugs for treatment of HIV-1 infection and virological response to therapy, results from 12 different studies were re-analysed according to a standard data analysis plan. These studies included nine clinical trials and three observational cohorts. The primary end-point in our analyses was virological failure by week 24. Baseline factors that were investigated as predictors of virological failure were plasma HIV-1 RNA, the number and type of new antiretroviral drugs in the regimen, and viral susceptibility to the drugs in the regimen, determined by genotyping or phenotyping methods. These analyses confirmed the importance of both genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance as predictors of virological failure, whether these factors were analysed separately or adjusted for other baseline confounding factors. In most of the re-analysed studies, the odds of virological failure were reduced by about twofold for each additional drug in the regimen to which the patient's virus was sensitive by genotyping methods, and by about two- to threefold for each additional drug that was sensitive by phenotyping.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135965350000500112

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
DeGruttola, V., Dix, L., D'Aquila, R., Holder, D., Phillips, A., Ait-Khaled, M., Baxter, J., Clevenbergh, P., Hammer, S., Harrigan, R., Katzenstein, D., Lanier, R., Miller, M., Para, M., Yerly, S., Zolopa, A., Murray, J., Patick, A., Miller, V., Castillo, S., Pedneault, L., & Mellors, J.
Venue
Antiviral Therapy
Published
2000-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
  • 1359-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-2058
OpenAlex
W15969640
Cited by
326
References
0
FWCI
30.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relation between Baseline HIV Drug Resistance and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy: Re-Analysis of Retrospective and Prospective Studies Using a Standardized Data Analysis Plan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/135965350000500112
The paper
DeGruttola, V., Dix, L., D'Aquila, R., Holder, D., Phillips, A., Ait-Khaled, M., Baxter, J., Clevenbergh, P., Hammer, S., Harrigan, R., Katzenstein, D., Lanier, R., Miller, M., Para, M., Yerly, S., Zolopa, A., Murray, J., Patick, A., Miller, V., . . . Mellors, J. (2000). The Relation between Baseline HIV Drug Resistance and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy: Re-Analysis of Retrospective and Prospective Studies Using a Standardized Data Analysis Plan. Antiviral Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1177/135965350000500112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.